Comparative Optimization of Microwave and Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Bioactive Compounds and Proteins from Craterellus cornucopioides
Mojca Čakić Semenčić, Filip Šupljika, Anet Režek Jambrak, Monika Kovačević, Nina Čuljak, Ivana Repić, Ksenija Markov, Jadranka Frece

TL;DR
This study compares microwave and ultrasound methods for extracting bioactive compounds and proteins from a mushroom, finding that ultrasound with water is most effective.
Contribution
The study introduces a comparative optimization of microwave and ultrasound extraction for bioactive compounds and proteins from Craterellus cornucopioides.
Findings
Water was the most effective solvent for nearly all parameters in both extraction methods.
Ultrasound-assisted extraction outperformed microwave extraction in protein yield and antioxidant potential.
Ethanol was better than water for glutathione recovery in the microwave system.
Abstract
This study investigates the optimization of extraction processes for bioactive compounds and proteins from the mushroom Craterellus cornucopioides by comparing Microwave-Assisted Extraction and Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction. Using Response Surface Methodology, the effects of temperature or amplitude, time, and solvent type were evaluated on total phenols, flavonoids, proteins, glutathione content, and antioxidant capacity measured by DPPH and FRAP assays. Additionally, the antimicrobial potential of the extracts was screened against various pathogens. Results demonstrated that water was the most effective solvent for nearly all parameters across both techniques, providing a unified optimum in the ultrasound system at six minutes and one hundred percent amplitude. However, a notable exception was observed for glutathione recovery in the microwave system, where ethanol proved superior to…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFungal Biology and Applications · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls · Food Drying and Modeling
