Multicenter evaluation of the QuickMIC® rapid AST system in clinical practice: impact on turnaround time compared to routine AST systems
Anna Olsson, Alexandra Rafeletou, Amanda Åman, Nicolette Athanasiou, Celia García-Rivera, Derek Gerstbrein, Brian Mesich, Logan Patterson, Julia Vahturova, Nicole VanZeeland, Andrea Ricart-Silvestre, Matthew L. Faron, Jessica Hoff, Kevin Alby, Marina Ivanova

TL;DR
This study compares a new rapid antibiotic susceptibility test, QuickMIC, with traditional systems, showing it provides faster results while maintaining accuracy.
Contribution
The study demonstrates that the QuickMIC system significantly reduces time-to-result and turnaround time for antibiotic susceptibility testing in clinical practice.
Findings
QuickMIC's time-to-result was 3 hours and 4 minutes, much faster than 9–19 hours for routine systems.
QuickMIC's turnaround time was 10–11 hours 30 minutes, compared to 22–45 hours for traditional systems.
The system showed >95% agreement and acceptable bias compared to established AST systems.
Abstract
Increased antibiotic resistance highlights the need for new, rapid antibiotic susceptibility tests to guide therapy, especially in critical disease such as bloodstream infections and sepsis. This study investigates a new ultra-rapid AST system in multiple clinical laboratories, with respect to accuracy, speed and turnaround time in comparison to commonly used AST systems. The QuickMIC system is compared to the commonly used automated AST systems BD Phoenix™ (BD, USA), MicroScan WalkAway plus (Beckman Coulter, USA) and VITEK® 2 (bioMérieux, France) by concurrent testing of incoming positive blood-cultures with Gram-negative bacteria in four clinical laboratories located in the EU and USA, on the basis of agreement of results, time-to-result (TTR, analysis time) and turnaround time (TAT, time from blood culture positivity or blood culture processing to actionable result). A total of 155…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing · Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria · Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
