Comparison of chemo-mechanical and conventional caries removal methods in 6-to-12-year-old children: Randomized clinical trial
Abdulrahman Bala Malami, Yewande Isabella Adeyemo, Aliyu Aminu, Folakemi Adenike Oredugba

TL;DR
This study compared two methods for removing tooth decay in children and found that while drilling is faster and more effective, a chemical method causes less anxiety and is better for patient comfort.
Contribution
The study provides a direct comparison of chemo-mechanical and conventional drilling methods in children, focusing on effectiveness and patient behavior.
Findings
Conventional drilling reduced bacterial load more effectively than the chemo-mechanical method.
Chemo-mechanical removal took significantly longer than conventional drilling.
Children showed more positive behavior during chemo-mechanical treatment compared to drilling.
Abstract
To address the discomfort associated with conventional drilling for caries removal in children, a minimally invasive approach such as chemo-mechanical caries removal was developed. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of, and patient behavior associated with chemo-mechanical caries removal versus conventional drilling in children aged 6–12 years. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial was conducted involving 66 molar teeth. The effectiveness of Papacarie Duo Gel and conventional drilling methods was assessed using colony-forming unit (CFU) counts before and after each treatment. Cavity preparation time and intraoperative patient behavior using the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale were also evaluated. Both methods resulted in a significant reduction in bacterial counts post-treatment. However, conventional drilling showed a greater percentage reduction in bacterial load (82.9 ±…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDental Health and Care Utilization · Dental materials and restorations · Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
