Draft genome sequences of two Thioalkalivibrio sulfidiphilus strains isolated from a pilot-scale haloalkaline biodesulfurization installation
Caroline M. Plugge, Suyash Gupta, Sarahi Garcia Villa, Peer H. A. Timmers, Gerard Muyzer

TL;DR
This paper reports the genome sequences of two Thioalkalivibrio sulfidiphilus strains used in a biodesulfurization process.
Contribution
The study provides new genome data for two strains involved in haloalkaline biodesulfurization.
Findings
The genomes include genes for Flavocytochrome c sulfide dehydrogenase and SoxAX cytochromes.
These genes are crucial for respiration and thiosulfate oxidation in the biodesulfurization process.
Abstract
The genome sequences of two Thioalkalivibrio sulfidiphilus strains, SGAR-7 and SGAR-13, isolated from a pilot-scale haloalkaline biodesulfurization (BD) installation, are reported. The genomes comprise Flavocytochrome c sulfide dehydrogenase and SoxAX cytochromes, which are essential for respiration and thiosulfate oxidation, offering insights into Thioalkalivibrio’s role in BD.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Strain SGAR-7 | Strain SGAR-13 | |
|---|---|---|
| BioSample accession no. |
|
|
| Raw reads Illumina | 8,190,030 | 8,713,036 |
| Raw reads Nanopore | 39,340 | 77,656 |
| Genome size (bp) | 3,277,547 | 3,312,445 |
| Genome coverage Illumina (×) | 2.5 | 2.6 |
| Genome coverage Nanopore (×) | 1.9 | 2.6 |
| Number of contigs | 1 (circular) | 3 |
| 14.85 | 13.54 | |
| CheckM completness (%) | 99.94 | 99.94 |
| CheckM contamination (%) | 0.75 | 1.72 |
| DNA coding region (CDS) | 3,123 | 3,166 |
| G + C content (%) | 65.32 | 65.38 |
| Total genes | 3,175 | 3,218 |
| RNA genes | 52 | 52 |
| rRNA operons (5S, 16S, 23S) | 1, 1, 1 | 1, 1, 1 |
| Protein-coding genes | 3,075 | 3,122 |
| Pseudo genes | 48 | 44 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies · Mine drainage and remediation techniques · Industrial Gas Emission Control
ANNOUNCEMENT
Although numerous strains have been isolated from natural sources, Thioalkalivibrio species have also been identified as key players in man-made BD systems, where they convert sulfide to elemental sulfur (1–5). We enriched and isolated the most dominant sulfide and thiosulfate-oxidizing bacteria from a pilot-scale haloalkaline BD system through serial dilution. Two isolates, Thioalkalivibrio sulfidiphilus strains SGAR-7 and SGAR-13, were obtained, and their genomes were sequenced. Default parameters were used for all analyzes except where otherwise noted.
SGAR-7 and SGAR-13 were enriched and routinely grown in serial dilution under oxygen-limiting conditions (12% vol/vol) in a haloalkaline mineral medium at pH 8.5 in serum bottles at 35°C. The medium was prepared as described previously (6), with 20 mM sodium thiosulfate and without urea. The highest dilutions with growth were streak plated on the same medium (6) with 2% (wt/vol) washed agar. SGAR-7 and SGAR-13 were obtained in pure culture, phylogenetically analyzed by sequencing the 16S rRNA gene (7) and genome sequencing. The taxonomic identity of both strains was confirmed using the GTDB-Tk classifier (8). Genomic DNA was extracted using the modified CTAB method (9,10) and sequenced with the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 and Oxford Nanopore sequencing platforms. For Illumina, the DNA concentration, purity, and integrity were analyzed using the Agilent 5400 fragment analyzer. For library preparation, the DNA was randomly sheared into short fragments using a standard kit for NovaSeq 6000. Fragments were repaired, A-tailed, and ligated with Illumina adapters. Adapter-containing fragments were amplified by PCR, size-selected for 350 bp, and purified. Libraries were checked using Qubit and real-time qPCR and pooled. Paired-end 150 bp sequencing was done with the Illumina NovoSeq 6000 sequencer. DNA quality checks, library preparation, and sequencing were performed at Novogene Ltd., Cambridge, UK.
Raw sequencing data were cleaned of adapter sequences, reads with N > 10%, and low-quality reads (Q-score <5).
The DNA library for Oxford Nanopore sequencing was prepared using Nanopore Kit SQK-LSK109 (Oxford Nanopore, UK) without DNA shearing. Sequencing was performed on the MinION platform using a FLO-FLG001 flow cell with 9.4.1 chemistry, followed by base calling with the MinKNOW v21.02.2 and Guppy v4.3.4 protocol. Raw read quality control was conducted using MinKNOW.
Hybrid genome assembly was performed using Unicycler v0.4.9 under standard conditions for both strains (11). For SGAR-7, a complete circular genome was generated, measuring 3,277,547 bp. SGAR-13 was assembled into three contigs (3,270,812, 41,633, and 377 bp). The quality of the assembled genomes was assessed with CheckM v1.4.0 (12). Subsequently, the assembled genomes were annotated using the NCBI with the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (13). Further genome characteristics are shown in Table 1.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Sorokin DY, Kuenen JG. 2005. Haloalkaliphilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in soda lakes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:685–702. doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.10.00516102598 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2de Rink R, Klok JBM, van Heeringen GJ, Sorokin DY, Ter Heijne A, Zeijlmaker R, Mos YM, de Wilde V, Keesman KJ, Buisman CJN. 2019. Increasing the selectivity for sulfur formation in biological gas desulfurization. Environ Sci Technol 53:4519–4527. doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b 0674930882225 PMC 6581417 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3de Rink R, Gupta S, Piccioli de Carolis F, Liu D, ter Heijne A, Klok JBM, Buisman CJN. 2021. Effect of process conditions on the performance of a dual-reactor biodesulfurization process. J Environ Chem Eng 9:106450. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2021.106450 · doi ↗
- 4Gupta S, Plugge CM, Klok JBM, Muyzer G. 2022. Comparative analysis of microbial communities from different full-scale haloalkaline biodesulfurization systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 106:1759–1776. doi:10.1007/s 00253-022-11771-y 35147744 PMC 8882115 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Gupta S, Rink R, Klok JBM, Muyzer G, Plugge CM. 2023. Process conditions affect microbial diversity and activity in a haloalkaline biodesulfurization system. Appl Environ Microbiol 90:e 01864-23. doi:10.1128/aem.01864-2338078763 PMC 10807427 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Kiragosyan K, Klok JBM, Keesman KJ, Roman P, Janssen AJH. 2019. Development and validation of a physiologically based kinetic model for starting up and operation of the biological gas desulfurization process under haloalkaline conditions. Water Res X 4:100035. doi:10.1016/j.wroa.2019.10003531334497 PMC 6614595 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 1991. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173:697–703. doi:10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.19911987160 PMC 207061 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. 2020. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 36:1925–1927. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz 848PMC 770375931730192 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
