Beyond Right and Wrong: Fostering Connection in Emotion Theory Debates
Karlijn van Heijst, Annemie Ploeger, Mariska E. Kret
TL;DR
This paper suggests that instead of arguing which emotion theory is correct, researchers should focus on how different theories can work together to better understand emotions.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new perspective on emotion theory debates by advocating for collaboration over competition between theoretical frameworks.
Findings
Basic emotion theories and the theory of constructed emotion can complement each other.
Focusing on collaboration rather than correctness can lead to more fruitful research outcomes.
Clarifying theoretical questions is essential for understanding the evolutionary basis of emotion.
Abstract
Basic emotion theories (BETs) and the theory of constructed emotion (TCE) have both made significant contributions to the field of affective science despite a persistent divide between the two camps. We argue that focusing on which camp is right hampers possibly fruitful collaborations between affective researchers working within different theoretical frameworks. The TCE and BETs can complement each other because they focus on different features of and questions about affective processes. Clearly defining and operationalizing these questions is crucial to further elucidating the evolutionary basis of emotion and feeling.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEmotions and Moral Behavior · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Cultural Differences and Values