# Beyond Right and Wrong: Fostering Connection in Emotion Theory Debates

## TL;DR

This paper suggests that instead of arguing which emotion theory is correct, researchers should focus on how different theories can work together to better understand emotions.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a new perspective on emotion theory debates by advocating for collaboration over competition between theoretical frameworks.

## Key findings

- Basic emotion theories and the theory of constructed emotion can complement each other.
- Focusing on collaboration rather than correctness can lead to more fruitful research outcomes.
- Clarifying theoretical questions is essential for understanding the evolutionary basis of emotion.

## Abstract

Basic emotion theories (BETs) and the theory of constructed emotion (TCE) have both made significant contributions to the field of affective science despite a persistent divide between the two camps. We argue that focusing on which camp is right hampers possibly fruitful collaborations between affective researchers working within different theoretical frameworks. The TCE and BETs can complement each other because they focus on different features of and questions about affective processes. Clearly defining and operationalizing these questions is crucial to further elucidating the evolutionary basis of emotion and feeling.