Complete genome sequences of Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155 cluster E bacteriophages Policronamos and Palpatine
Shule M. Aggabao, Rebecca Hassell, Bryson S. Leary, Sheena I. Bautista, Hayzen H. Chamberlain, Kyla Radke, Harry M. Peless, Payson C. Danielson, Matthew N. Jackson, Hyunbi Hwang, Jacob D. Scott, Elisa A. Correa Lazaro, Atalie B. Bogh, Jayden S. Longhurst, Spencer T. Payne

TL;DR
This paper reports the complete genome sequences of two bacteriophages, Policronamos and Palpatine, which infect the Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155 strain.
Contribution
The study provides new genomic data and ORF annotations for two mycobacteriophages in subcluster E.
Findings
Policronamos has a 75,894-bp genome with 146 open reading frames.
Palpatine has a 75,809-bp genome with 140 open reading frames.
Both phages show gene synteny matching other subcluster E mycobacteriophages.
Abstract
Mycobacteriophages Policronamos and Palpatine are tailed phages infecting the Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155 strain. The genome for Policronamos is 75,894 bp long with 146 open reading frames (ORFs), while the Palpatine genome is 75,809 bp long with 140 ORFs. The gene synteny of both mycobacteriophages closely matches other phage genomes in subcluster E.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Fig 1| Feature | Value for: | |
|---|---|---|
| Policronamos | Palpatine | |
| GPS coordinates | 40.273539°N, 111.640718°W | 40.273539°N, 111.640718°W |
| Isolation details | 2023, 37°C, surface | 2023, 35°C, surface |
| Sequence reads (millions) | 1.41 | 1.10 |
| Sequence depth (x coverage) | 2,791 | 2,185 |
| Genome length (base pairs) | 75,894 | 75,809 |
| GC content (%) | 63% | 63% |
| No. of ORFs | 145 | 143 |
| No. of orphams | 6 | 0 |
| No. of tRNAs | 2 | 2 |
| No. of ORFs with putative function (%) | 47 (32%) | 45 (31%) |
| No. of ORFs with no putative function, including orphams (%) | 98 (68%) | 98 (68%) |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBacteriophages and microbial interactions · Microbial infections and disease research · Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
ANNOUNCEMENT
The discovery and characterization of bacteriophages infecting the Mycobacterium genus advance the development of potential phage-based therapies, especially in combating multidrug-resistant pathogenic strains within the Mycobacterium genus (1). Here, we report the annotated genomes for two novel mycobacteriophages, Policronamos and Palpatine.
Policronamos and Palpatine were both isolated from compost collected in Provo, Utah (Table 1). Each sample was suspended in 7H9 broth and filtered through a 0.22 µm filter. Plaque assays of the filtrate were performed with host bacterium (Mycobacterium smegmatis mc^2^155) amalgamated in 7H9 broth, mixed with top agar, and plated onto 7H10 agar, then aerobically incubated at 37°C for 2 days. Three cycles of purification were performed to ensure isolation of individual phages, yielding Policronamos and Palpatine. Plaques for Policronamos were clear and circular (~5 mm in diameter), while those for Palpatine were turbid (~1.4 cm in diameter), potentially indicating lysogeny. High-titer lysates (>1 × 10^9^ PFU/mL) were prepared by flooding nearly confluent "web-plates" with Middlebrook 7H9 broth, incubating for 2 hours at room temperature, decanting, and filtering through a 0.22 µm filter. DNA was extracted from the lysate by using the Norgen Phage DNA Isolation Kit following the manufacturer’s protocol prior to library preparation and sequencing. Briefly, 0.5 µg of DNA per sample was used for DNA library preparation using the NEBNext Ultra DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, USA) following manufacturer’s recommendations and unique index codes were added to each sample. The DNA samples were sonicated to a size of 350 bp, then DNA fragments were end-polished, A-tailed, and ligated with the full-length adaptor for Illumina sequencing with further PCR amplification. PCR products were purified (AMPure XP system) and libraries were analyzed for size distribution with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and quantified using real-time PCR. The whole genomes were sequenced using Illumina NovaSeq X PE150 with the corresponding sequencing kit, generating 2.5–3.5 million 150 bp paired-end reads per genome. Reads were trimmed using TrimGalore v0.6.6 (2) with a minimum length of 20 bases and minimum phred quality score of 20. Trimmed reads underwent assembly with Newbler v.2.9 (3), prior to validation using CONSED v.2.9 (4) with default parameters.
FASTA files of each genome sequence were first auto-annotated by the GeneMark 3.0 (5) and Glimmer 2.5 (6) algorithms within DNA Master v.5.23.6 (7) with default parameters. Automated gene annotations were manually verified using default parameters for: Starterator server v.1.2, web-based Phamerator v.600 genome maps (8), tRNAscanSE v.2.0 tRNA analysis (9), the HHPRED web server (10), GeneMarkS v.4.28 coding potential maps (11), PhageScope v.1.0 (12), and the NCBI BLASTP server (13). Negative-stained scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM; 2% uranyl acetate) imaging showed that these phages have a siphovirus-like morphotype (Fig. 1).
STEM images of Policronamos (left) and Palpatine (right) with 20 kV and an 86 pA probe. Micrographs were collected using a STEM II detector and an ion beam with a brightfield light in immersion mode at ~350,000x (Policronamos) or 500,000x (Palpatine) magnification on a Helios Nanolab 600 FEI instrument.
BLASTN sequence similarity scores from the NCBI server were used to assign these phages to subcluster E. Policronamos contains six putative orphams (Table 1). We also identified frameshifts in both bacteriophages within their first Tail Assembly Chaperone open reading frame (ORF). The ongoing discovery and annotation of phages will augment our understanding of the diverse sequences and functions that exist in these microorganisms.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Azimi T, Mosadegh M, Nasiri MJ, Sabour S, Karimaei S, Nasser A. 2019. Phage therapy as a renewed therapeutic approach to mycobacterial infections: a comprehensive review. Infect Drug Resist 12:2943–2959. doi:10.2147/IDR.S 21863831571947 PMC 6756577 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Github. 2025. Felix Krueger/Trim Galore: a wrapper around Cutadapt and Fast QC to consistently apply adapter and quality trimming to Fast Q files, with extra functionality for RRBS data. https://github.com/Felix Krueger/Trim Galore.
- 3Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen Y-J, Chen Z, et al.. 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376–380. doi:10.1038/nature 0395916056220 PMC 1464427 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Gordon D, Green P. 2013. Consed: a graphical editor for next-generation sequencing. Bioinformatics 29:2936–2937. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt 51523995391 PMC 3810858 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Besemer J, Borodovsky M. 2005. Gene Mark: web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W 451–4. doi:10.1093/nar/gki 48715980510 PMC 1160247 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm 00917237039 PMC 2387122 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Pope WH, Jacobs-Sera D. 2018. Annotation of bacteriophage genome sequences using DNA Master: an overview. Methods Mol Biol 1681:217–229. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_1629134598 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Cresawn SG, Bogel M, Day N, Jacobs-Sera D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 2011. Phamerator: a bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 12:395. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-39521991981 PMC 3233612 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
