Evaluation of the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) in In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in a Tertiary Healthcare Facility

TL;DR

This study evaluates how the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) changes before in-hospital cardiac arrests, suggesting it could help identify at-risk patients up to 6 hours in advance.

Contribution

The study provides new evidence that MEWS trends can predict cardiac arrest up to 6 hours before the event.

Findings

MEWS increased significantly from 12 hours to 1 hour before cardiac arrest (p ≤ 0.001).

Only 20.7% of patients who had a cardiac arrest survived to hospital discharge.

MEWS increased from 6 hours to 1 hour before cardiac arrest (p = 0.023).

Abstract

Background/Objective: In-hospital cardiac arrest has high incidence and poor survival rates, posing a significant healthcare challenge. It is important to intervene in the hours before the cardiac arrest to prevent poor outcomes. The modified early warning score (MEWS) is a validated tool for identifying a deteriorating patient. It is an aggregate of vital signs and level of consciousness. We retrospectively evaluated MEWS for trends that might predict patient outcomes. Methods: We performed a single-center, one-year, retrospective study. A comprehensive review was conducted for patients aged 18 years and above who experienced a cardiac arrest. Cases that occurred within an intensive care unit, emergency department, during a procedure, or outside the hospital were excluded. A total of 87 cases met our predefined inclusion criteria. We collected data at 12 h, 6 h and 1 h time periods prior to the cardiac arrest. A trend analysis using a linear model with analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction was performed. Results: Out of 87 patients included in the study, 59 (67.8%) had an immediate return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Among those who achieved ROSC, 41 (69.5%) died during the admission. Only 20.7% of the patients that sustained a cardiac arrest survived to discharge. A significant increase in the average MEWS was noted from the 12 h period (MEWS = 3.95 ± 2.4) to the 1 h period (MEWS = 5.98 ± 3.5) (p ≤ 0.001) and the 6 h period (4.65 ± 2.6) to the 1 h period (5.98 ± 3.5) (p = 0.023) prior to cardiac arrest. Conclusions: An increase in the MEWS may be a valuable tool in identifying at-risk patients and provides an opportunity to intervene at least 6 h before a cardiac arrest event. Further research is needed to validate the results of our study.

Figures