Effect and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic lung cancer: A retrospective study
Arvind Kumar, Arun Raja, Dipika Narayan

TL;DR
This study examines the effectiveness and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in treating metastatic lung cancer.
Contribution
The study reports a 60% clinical benefit ratio in a small patient cohort.
Findings
A 60% clinical benefit ratio was observed in 30 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
The study highlights limitations such as small sample size and patient heterogeneity.
Abstract
Cancer is a major global public health issue. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly used for managing advanced malignancies. However, their effect is limited by immune-related adverse events. Hence, a retrospective, single-institutional study found a 60% clinical benefit ratio among 30 patients receiving Immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy. Nonetheless, a small sample size, patient heterogeneity and retrospective design require further validation for more conclusive results.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers · Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations · Lung Cancer Research Studies
