Axial compressive behavior of lithium slag and rubber concrete-filled steel tube stub columns
Ying Yang, Jiongfeng Liang, Wanjie Zou, Caisen Wang, Jicheng Liu
TL;DR
This study explores using lithium slag and waste rubber in concrete-filled steel tube columns to reduce industrial waste and improve structural performance.
Contribution
A new concrete-filled steel tube design using lithium slag and rubber is proposed, with a modified formula for predicting bearing capacity.
Findings
LSRuCFST columns showed damage patterns similar to conventional CFST columns.
Optimal bearing capacity was achieved with 20% lithium slag and 10% rubber replacement.
A modified computational formula for bearing capacity was proposed and validated.
Abstract
In order to solve the harm of industrial waste such as lithium slag and waste rubber to the environment, this paper put forward the structure of lithium slag and rubber concrete-filled steel tube (LSRuCFST) stub column, which was replaced cement and sand in concrete by lithium slag and waste rubber respectively. Through the axial compression test of 11 LSRuCFST specimens with various lithium slag replacement ratios (0, 10%, 20%, 30%) and rubber replacement ratios (0, 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%), the damage patterns and mechanical characteristics of LSRuCFST columns were studied. The experimental phenomena showed that the damage patterns of 11 specimens were similar to the ordinary concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) colunms. With 20% replacement ratio of lithium slag and 10% replacement ratio of rubber, the largest increase of bearing capacity was optimal. Then, the bearing capacities of LSRuCFST…
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
Figure 27
Figure 28
Figure 29
Figure 30
Figure 31
Figure 32
Figure 33
Figure 34
Figure 35
Figure 36
Figure 37
Figure 38
Figure 39
Figure 40
Figure 41
Figure 42
Figure 43
Figure 44
Figure 45
Figure 46
Figure 47
Figure 48
Figure 49
Figure 50Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis