Limited Evidence of Shared Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening in Audio-Recorded Primary Care Visits Among Black Men and their Healthcare Providers
Elizabeth R. Stevens, Jerry Thomas, Natalia Martinez-Lopez, Angela Fagerlin, Shannon Ciprut, Michele Shedlin, Heather T. Gold, Huilin Li, J. Kelly Davis, Ada Campagna, Sandeep Bhat, Rueben Warren, Peter Ubel, Joseph E. Ravenell, Danil V. Makarov

TL;DR
This study found limited shared decision making during prostate cancer screening discussions between Black men and their healthcare providers in primary care.
Contribution
The study provides empirical evidence on the limited use of shared decision making in prostate cancer screening for Black men.
Findings
Most providers discussed advantages and disadvantages of PSA screening, but few patients received all SDM elements.
Only 3 out of 13 patients were directly asked about their screening preferences.
Average OPTION score was 25/100, indicating limited patient involvement in decision making.
Abstract
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based prostate cancer screening is a preference-sensitive decision for which experts recommend a shared decision making (SDM) approach. This study aimed to examine PSA screening SDM in primary care. Methods included qualitative analysis of audio-recorded patient-provider interactions supplemented by quantitative description. Participants included 5 clinic providers and 13 patients who were: (1) 40–69 years old, (2) Black, (3) male, and (4) attending clinic for routine primary care. Main measures were SDM element themes and “observing patient involvement in decision making” (OPTION) scoring. Some discussions addressed advantages, disadvantages, and/or scientific uncertainty of screening, however, few patients received all SDM elements. Nearly all providers recommended screening, however, only 3 patients were directly asked about screening preferences. Few…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
