Using real-world evidence to complement evidence from randomized controlled trials on oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention
Mark J. R. Smeets, Suzanne C. Cannegieter

TL;DR
This paper explores how real-world data can support clinical trial findings for anticoagulants used in stroke prevention.
Contribution
The paper highlights the value of real-world evidence in complementing traditional clinical trial data for anticoagulant evaluation.
Findings
Real-world data can provide insights into anticoagulant effectiveness in diverse patient populations.
Complementing clinical trials with real-world evidence may improve understanding of long-term outcomes.
Abstract
Mark J. R. Smeets and Suzanne C. Cannegieter discuss the use of real world data to complement data generated by clinical trials of systemic anticoagulants.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes · Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases · Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
