Comment on Utsumi et al. Differences in Pathophysiology and Treatment Efficacy Based on Heterogeneous Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Medicina 2024, 60, 510
Raghuraman M. Sethuraman, Buddhan Rajarathinam, Pranjali Kurhekar
TL;DR
This comment paper addresses inaccuracies in a review on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, focusing on NSE thresholds and reference errors.
Contribution
The paper clarifies threshold values for neuron-specific enolase and corrects misquoted references in Utsumi et al.'s work.
Findings
Threshold values for neuron-specific enolase differ based on initial cardiac arrest rhythm.
Several references in the original article were misquoted or incorrectly cited.
Correcting these issues improves the accuracy of OHCA pathophysiology and treatment interpretations.
Abstract
We read with great interest the review article on pathophysiology and treatment based on different out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. We wish to present our comments on the threshold values for neuron-specific enolase (NSE) based on the initial rhythm and the misquoting of a few references in that article.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation · Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring · Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring