Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the LYMPH-ICF Instrument for Lymphedema into Portuguese/Brazil

TL;DR

This study translated and adapted a lymphedema health questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese, ensuring cultural relevance and high agreement.

Contribution

The LYMPH-ICF instrument was cross-culturally adapted for Brazilian Portuguese with high content validity.

Findings

Eight out of 29 questions were modified due to idiomatic disagreement.

Content reliability was achieved with a validity coefficient of 0.90.

The instrument was successfully adapted for use in Brazil.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to cross-culturally adapt the Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire Lymphoedema (LYMPH-ICF) instrument into Brazilian Portuguese and conduct a pilot application (n = 10), without psychometric pretensions.

Methodological research was conducted, following the steps of translation, synthesis, back-translation, and evaluation by the expert committee. Two translators, two back-translators, and twelve professionals participated in the expert committee. A pretest was carried out with 10 patients with secondary lymphedema due to breast cancer. The degree of agreement was determined by the content validity coefficient.

It was necessary to modify 8 out of the 29 questions comprising the questionnaire, which exhibited idiomatic disagreement. However, despite these changes, there were no indications of impairments, as content reliability was achieved through a validity coefficient of 0.90.

The instrument was successfully translated and cross-culturally adapted for Brazil with a high level of agreement.

realizar a adaptação transcultural do instrumento Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire Lymphoedema (LYMPH-ICF) para o português do Brasil e uma aplicação piloto (n = 10), sem pretensão psicométrica.

pesquisa metodológica, seguindo os passos de tradução, síntese, retrotradução e avaliação pelo comitê de especialistas. Participaram dois tradutores, dois retrotradutores e doze profissionais para o comitê de especialistas. Realizou-se o pré-teste com 10 pacientes com linfedema secundário ao câncer de mama. E o grau de concordância foi obtido pelo coeficiente de validade de conteúdo.

houve a necessidade de modificar 8 das 29 questões que compõem o questionário, as quais demonstraram discordância idiomática. Contudo, mesmo que tais alterações tenham sido realizadas, não houve indicação de prejuízos, já que foi alcançada a confiabilidade do conteúdo através da obtenção de 0,90 pelo coeficiente de validade.

o instrumento foi traduzido e adaptado transculturalmente para o Brasil com alto grau de concordância.

Figures