Molecular Beam Epitaxy Growth of Antiferromagnetic Kagome Metal FeSn
Hisashi Inoue, Minyong Han, Linda Ye, Takehito Suzuki, and Joseph. G., Checkelsky

TL;DR
This paper reports the first successful epitaxial growth of high-quality FeSn thin films, a room-temperature antiferromagnet with Dirac fermions, enabling potential spintronics applications.
Contribution
It demonstrates the epitaxial growth of single crystalline FeSn films on SrTiO3 substrates, a significant step for device development.
Findings
High-quality FeSn films with RRR of 24
Antiferromagnetic ordering at 353 K
Potential for spintronics applications
Abstract
FeSn is a room-temperature antiferromagnet expected to host Dirac fermions in its electronic structure. The interplay of magnetic degree of freedom and the Dirac fermions makes FeSn an attractive platform for spintronics and electronic devices. While stabilization of thin film FeSn is needed for the development of such devices, there exist no previous report of epitaxial growth of single crystalline FeSn. Here we report the realization of epitaxial thin films of FeSn (001) grown by molecular beam epitaxy on single crystal SrTiO (111) substrates. By combining X-ray diffraction, electrical transport, and torque magnetometry measurements, we demonstrate the high quality of these films with the residual resistivity ratio and antiferromagnetic ordering at = 353 K. These developments open a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
11footnotetext: These authors contributed equally to the work.22footnotetext: Present address: Frontier Research Institute for Interdisciplinary Sciences and Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Miyagi 980-8577, Japan33footnotetext: Electronic mail: [email protected]
Molecular Beam Epitaxy Growth of Antiferromagnetic Kagome Metal FeSn
Hisashi Inoue1,a,b, Minyong Han1,a, Linda Ye1, Takehito Suzuki1, and Joseph. G. Checkelsky1,c
Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
Abstract
FeSn is a room-temperature antiferromagnet expected to host Dirac fermions in its electronic structure. The interplay of magnetic degree of freedom and the Dirac fermions makes FeSn an attractive platform for spintronics and electronic devices. While stabilization of thin film FeSn is needed for the development of such devices, there exist no previous report of epitaxial growth of single crystalline FeSn. Here we report the realization of epitaxial thin films of FeSn (001) grown by molecular beam epitaxy on single crystal SrTiO3 (111) substrates. By combining X-ray diffraction, electrical transport, and torque magnetometry measurements, we demonstrate the high quality of these films with the residual resistivity ratio and antiferromagnetic ordering at K. These developments open a pathway to manipulate the Dirac fermions in FeSn by both magnetic interactions and the electronic field effect for use in antiferromagnetic spintronics devices.
The antiferromagnetic metal FeSn consists of two-dimensional layers of corner-sharing triangle network of Fe, separated by honeycomb lattices of Sn [Fig. 1 (a)]. This geometrical configuration of Fe, called the kagome lattice, is expected to host a linearly dispersing Dirac band and a topological flat band in its electronic band structure [Fig. 1 (b)] Ye et al. (2018a, b); Yin et al. (2018, 2019). As the Dirac band and the flat band have been the platform for a number of intriguing physical phenomena arising from electronic correlation and the band topology Tang et al. (2011); Mazin et al. (2014), FeSn is a material platform in which the interplay between magnetism and topology can be explored.
To study the physics of the magnetic kagome lattice in FeSn and for its electronics applications, it is desirable to realize the material in a thin film form so that it can be processed into device structures and its physical properties can be tuned electrostatically. Here, we report the first realization of high quality magnetic FeSn thin films grown by molecular beam epitaxy. X-ray diffraction measurements indicate formation of single crystalline FeSn with sharp interfaces. Our capping and post-annealing procedures result in improved quality of the films as indicated by metallic electrical transport with residual resistivity ratio of 24. Furthermore, torque magnetometry measurements of these films confirm long-range antiferromagnetic order almost unchanged from that of bulk FeSn single crystals.
FeSn thin films were grown on single crystal SrTiO3 (111) substrates (Shinkosha, Co.) [Fig. 1 (c)]. Before being loaded into the growth chamber, the substrates were cleaned with acetone and methanol, and then annealed at 1050 ∘C in air for 1 hour, followed by sonication in pure water for 30 seconds at room temperature. We repeated the annealing and sonication procedures twice in order to prepare a flat surface suitable for epitaxial film growth Connell et al. (2012); Hallsteinsen et al. (2016); Woo et al. (2015). After loading to the growth chamber, we pre-annealed the substrates at 600 ∘C for 1 hour to remove any residual moisture and adsorbates. FeSn was deposited for 40 minutes by thermally evaporating Fe and Sn from solid sources using effusion cells. The substrate temperature during deposition was 150 ∘C. The ratio of beam-equivalent pressures (BEPs) was , where and are BEPs for Fe and Sn, respectively. After the deposition, some films were capped with amorphous BaF2, deposited at 200 ∘C for 30 minutes. Finally, these films were post-annealed at 500 ∘C for 12 hours to improve crystalline quality.
Figure 1 (d) shows X-ray diffraction spectra of samples with and without the BaF2 cap and post-annealing, where the wavelength of the incident X-ray beam was nm. They show a film peak at for the annealed sample and for the unannealed sample. These are close to the FeSn (002) peak position expected for a bulk single crystal ( nm), confirming the formation of epitaxial single crystalline FeSn. The shift of the peak position from that of the bulk single crystal reflects the residual epitaxial strain of 0.2 from the substrate. The film peak accompanies Laue interference fringes, indicating sharp interfaces. For the scattering geometry with the scattering vector perpendicular to the sample plane, we did not observe peaks other than SrTiO3 and FeSn , where is an integer.
In order to estimate the film thickness, we performed X-ray reflectivity measurements on a capped and annealed sample (see Fig. 2 (a)). The spectrum shows clear oscillations due to the interference of reflected X-ray beams indicating a flat film. By comparing the reflectivity data to a simulated relectivity curve using the model structure shown in Fig. 1 (c), we determined the thickness of FeSn and BaF2 cap to be 25.5 nm and 34.8 nm, respectively. We use these estimates for thicknesses hereafter.
The in-plane orientation of the FeSn thin film with respect to the SrTiO3 (111) substrate was determined from measurements of the FeSn {201} peaks and SrTiO3 {101} peaks, shown as a pole figure in Fig. 2 (b). The FeSn {201} peaks exhibit six-fold rotation symmetry while the SrTiO3 {101} peaks show three-fold rotation symmetry as expected from their crystal structures. The in-plane angle of the FeSn (201) peak matches with the angle of SrTiO3 (101), indicating that the in-plane crystal axes of FeSn and SrTiO3 are aligned at the FeSnSrTiO3 interface. We observe a small but finite response between the FeSn {201} peaks. We attribute this to formation of a minor crystal domain which is rotated by 30∘ in the in-plane direction.
For a reliable characterization of transport properties, the films were processed into Hall-bar devices. An optical microscope image of a device is shown in Fig. 3 (b) inset. The film was first patterned into a Hall-bar shape with photolithography followed by Ar milling. The milling was stopped at the FeSn / SrTiO3 interface by using a precisely calibrated milling rate (to prevent damage to the substrate). In the second step, edge contacts to the FeSn film were made by depositing Ti / Au using electron beam evaporation at an angle 15∘ away from the sample normal direction. The thicknesses for Ti and Au were 7 nm and 70 nm, respectively. Subsequent electrical contacts were made by Ag paint. The contact resistance was approximately 2 at temperature K.
Figure 3 (a) shows the temperature dependence of the resistivity of three different FeSn thin film samples: a Hall-bar device, a rectangular-shaped bare film with the BaF2 cap and post-annealing process, and a bare film without the BaF2 cap or the post-annealing process. The thickness of FeSn layer in all these samples was 25.5 nm. All samples showed metallic behavior with monotonically decreasing as temperature decreases. The resistivities at 300 K (2 K) of the bare films with and without the post-annealing process were 194 µ cm (8.1 µ cm) and 102 µ cm (9.5 µ cm), respectively. This gives residual resistivity ratio, , of for the film with post-annealing and for the film without post-annealing. The factor of 2 increase in signifies the improved quality of the FeSn films after the post-annealing process. The resistivity of the Hall-bar device at 300 K (2 K) was 328 µ cm (13.7 µ cm). The Hall-bar device exhibits , identical to that of the bare film with post-annealing. This indicates that the quality of the sample was unaffected by the device fabrication procedures.
A close inspection of of the Hall-bar device reveals a kink in the curve around K. To illustrate this more clearly, the derivative of as a function of temperature is shown in Fig. 3 (b). shows a clear feature at K. A similar behavior of has been reported for FeSn bulk single crystals and associated with an onset of the antiferromagnetic transition Stenström (1972). The correlation of this behavior with the magnetic phase transition in our FeSn film is discussed below.
Figure 3 (c) shows the magneto-resistance of the post-annealed sample. Magnetic fields were applied perpendicular to the sample plane. At room temperature, we see a small quadratic negative magneto-resistance, which is suppressed as temperature decreases and becomes positive below K. As we will show below, our FeSn thin films exhibit antiferromagnetic order at room temperature. Therefore it is likely that the quadratic negative magneto-resistance of our FeSn thin film arises due to modulation of resistance by the antiferromagnetic order, while the low-temperature positive magneto-resistance is induced by the Lorentz force Usami (1978).
The Hall curves of the sample with post-annealing exhibit a characteristic change of the sign of slopes as temperature decreases (see Fig. 3 (d)). The high field slope changes the sign from positive to negative around K, and the low field slope changes the sign from positive to negative around K. If we assume that only one band is occupied, this would indicate a carrier density change from 5.7 cm*-3* (holes) to 9.9 cm*-3* (electrons) from the high field Hall slope. Such a large carrier density change with temperature is unlikely; since Hall curves in Fig. 3 (d) shows clear non-linearity as a function of magnetic field, we attribute the Hall slope change to multi-band transport. This multi-band nature likely arises from the three-dimensional network of Sn in this material Ye et al. (2018a, b).
Bulk single crystals of FeSn are known to host antiferromagnetism below 368 K Hartmann and Wäppling (1987); Yamamoto (1966); Djéga-Mariadassou et al. (1966). The moments are ferromagnetically aligned within the (001) plane and antiferromagnetically stacked along the [001] direction in the antiferromagnetic phase Yamaguchi and Watanabe (1967). The spin direction is found to lie within the (001) plane Kulshreshtha and Raj (1981); Haggstrom et al. (1975). To confirm that antiferromagnetism appears in our FeSn thin films, we performed capacitive torque magnetometry measurements. A schematic of the measurement setup is shown in the inset of Fig. 4 (a). A FeSn thin film sample was attached to a 10 µm-thick BeCu cantilever and a magnetic field was applied at an angle from the sample normal. A magnetic torque is generated, and the consequent deflection of the cantilever was probed by the change in the capacitance between the cantilever and a fixed Au pad, where is the sample volume, is the magnetization, and is the magnetic flux density. was converted to using the geometry and the Young’s modulus of the BeCu cantilever. In the absence of any magnetic anisotropy, because aligns with , and is sensitive to the magnetic anisotropy of the sample.
In Fig. 4 (a), we plot of a 25.5 nm-thick FeSn film with the BaF2 cap and post-annealing. Above T = 360 K, exhibits a quadratic response with nearly temperature independent positive curvature for T. Such a response is characteristic of a paramagnet Wang et al. (2005). On the other hand, below T = 360 K, starts to deviate from a simple parabola and at 100 K it develops a negative dip around T. We note that similar W-shaped torque response was also observed in thin films of antiferromagnetic GdBi below the Néel temperature Inoue et al. (2019). We attribute the cusp feature of for T to a mechanical instability of the BeCu cantilever.
In Fig. 4 (b), we show temperature dependence of at 6 T. At 360 K, shows a kink, suggesting that an additional magnetic anisotropy developed below K. We attribute this feature to the appearance of an antiferromagnetic order in the FeSn film. By linearly extrapolating below K and above K, the Néel temperature of the film is given as the intersection of these lines K, which is close to the Néel temperature 368 K reported for FeSn bulk single crystals Hartmann and Wäppling (1987); Yamamoto (1966); Djéga-Mariadassou et al. (1966).
Finally we comment on the kink feature observed in in Fig. 3 (b). The temperature at which the kink occurs K is close to the temperature of magnetic transition K determined from the magnetic torque measurements. This suggests that the antiferromagnetic ordering of FeSn thin film gives rise to the feature in around .
In conclusion, we report the first successful growth and characterization of epitaxial thin films of FeSn, an antiferromagnetic kagome metal. By employing controlled growth by molecular beam epitaxy, and a cap-and-post-annaeling procedure, we established a method to fabricate high quality FeSn thin films with as confirmed by X-ray and electrical transport measurements. Stable antiferromagnetic order in our thin film at room temperature provides an opportunity to control the Dirac electronic properties by its magnetism as well as field-effect-gating for electronic and spintronics applications Šmejkal et al. (2017, 2018).
Acknowledgements.
We are grateful to R. Comin, M. Kang, J. van den Brink, S. Fang, and M. P. Ghimire for fruitful discussions. This research was funded, in part, by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation EPiQS Initiative, Grant No. GBMF3848 to J.G.C. and ARO Grant No. W911NF-16-1-0034. L.Y. acknowledges support by the STC Center for Integrated Quantum Materials, NSF grant number DMR-1231319, and the Tsinghua Education Foundation. The authors acknowledge characterization facility support provided by the Materials Research Laboratory at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, as well as fabrication facility support by the Microsystems Technology Laboratories at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Ye et al. (2018 a) L. Ye, M. Kang, J. Liu, F. von Cube, C. R. Wicker, T. Suzuki, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, D. C. Bell, L. Fu, R. Comin, and J. G. Checkelsky, Nature 555 , 638 (2018 a).
- 2Ye et al. (2018 b) L. Ye, M. K. Chan, R. D. Mc Donald, D. Graf, M. Kang, J. Liu, T. Suzuki, R. Comin, L. Fu, and J. G. Checkelsky, ar Xiv:1809.11159 (2018 b).
- 3Yin et al. (2018) J.-X. Yin, S. S. Zhang, H. Li, K. Jiang, G. Chang, B. Zhang, B. Lian, C. Xiang, I. Belopolski, H. Zheng, T. A. Cochran, S.-Y. Xu, G. Bian, K. Liu, T.-R. Chang, H. Lin, Z.-Y. Lu, Z. Wang, S. Jia, W. Wang, and M. Z. Hasan, Nature 562 , 91 (2018).
- 4Yin et al. (2019) J.-X. Yin, S. S. Zhang, G. Chang, Q. Wang, S. S. Tsirkin, Z. Guguchia, B. Lian, H. Zhou, K. Jiang, I. Belopolski, N. Shumiya, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, T. A. Cochran, H. Lin, Z. Wang, T. Neupert, S. Jia, H. Lei, and M. Z. Hasan, Nat. Phys. 15 , 443 (2019).
- 5Tang et al. (2011) E. Tang, J. W. Mei, and X. G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 , 236802 (2011).
- 6Mazin et al. (2014) I. I. Mazin, H. O. Jeschke, F. Lechermann, H. Lee, M. Fink, R. Thomale, and R. Valenti, Nat. Commun. 5 , 4261 (2014).
- 7Connell et al. (2012) J. G. Connell, B. J. Isaac, G. B. Ekanayake, D. R. Strachan, and S. S. A. Seo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 , 251607 (2012).
- 8Hallsteinsen et al. (2016) I. Hallsteinsen, M. Nord, T. Bolstad, P.-E. Vullum, J. E. Boschker, P. Longo, R. Takahashi, R. Holmestad, M. Lippmaa, and T. Tybell, Cryst. Growth Des. 16 , 2357 (2016).
