Migration of Mg and other interstitial metal dopants in GaN
Giacomo Miceli, Alfredo Pasquarello

TL;DR
This study uses density functional calculations to analyze how magnesium and other interstitial metal dopants migrate in GaN, revealing their diffusion pathways, barriers, and dependence on size and charge.
Contribution
It provides detailed migration energy barriers for Mg, Li, Na, and Be in GaN, highlighting the effects of dopant size and charge on diffusion behavior.
Findings
Mg diffuses isotropically with a barrier of 2.1 eV.
Be shows anisotropic diffusion with barriers of 0.76 and 1.88 eV.
The Mg migration barrier aligns with experimental estimates.
Abstract
The minimum energy paths for the migration of interstitial Mg in wurtzite GaN are studied through density functional calculations. The study also comprises Li, Na, and Be dopants to examine the dependence on size and charge of the dopant species. In all cases considered, the impurities diffuse like ions without any tendency of localizing charge. Li, Mg, and to some extent Na, diffuse almost isotropically in GaN, with average diffusion barriers of 1.1, 2.1, and 2.5 eV, respectively. Instead Be shows a marked anisotropy with energy barriers of 0.76 and 1.88 eV for diffusion paths perpendicular and parallel to the c-axis. The diffusion barrier generally increases with ionic charge and ionic radius, but their interplay is not trivial. The calculated migration barrier for Mg is consistent with the values estimated in a recent beta- emission channeling experiment.
| Cation | Ga | N | OO′ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li+ | 0.76 | 2.34 | 1.91 | 0.62 |
| Na+ | 1.02 | 2.27 | 2.13 | 0.28 |
| Be2+ | 0.45 | 2.60 | 1.67 | 1.06 |
| Mg2+ | 0.72 | 2.35 | 2.03 | 0.35 |
| Cation | Path | Path | Path |
|---|---|---|---|
| Li+ | 1.05 | 1.16 | – |
| Na+ | 2.41 | 2.95 | 2.01 |
| Be2+ | 1.88 | 0.76 | – |
| Mg2+ | 2.01 | 2.20 | 2.19 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Migration of Mg and other interstitial metal dopants in GaN
Giacomo Miceli
Chaire de Simulation à l’Echelle Atomique (CSEA), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Alfredo Pasquarello
Chaire de Simulation à l’Echelle Atomique (CSEA), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Abstract
The minimum energy paths for the migration of interstitial Mg in wurtzite GaN are studied through density functional calculations. The study also comprises Li, Na, and Be dopants to examine the dependence on size and charge of the dopant species. In all cases considered, the impurities diffuse like ions without any tendency of localizing charge. Li, Mg, and to some extent Na, diffuse almost isotropically in GaN, with average diffusion barriers of 1.1, 2.1, and 2.5 eV, respectively. Instead Be shows a marked anisotropy with energy barriers of 0.76 and 1.88 eV for diffusion paths perpendicular and parallel to the -axis. The diffusion barrier generally increases with ionic charge and ionic radius, but their interplay is not trivial. The calculated migration barrier for Mg is consistent with the values estimated in a recent emission channeling experiment.
Its wide and direct band gap, high thermal and electric conductivity, and large breakdown fields make of GaN an ideally suited compound for electronic and optoelectronic devices.Pearton et al. (1999) However, while GaN is already an essential compound in commercially available blue-light-emitting diodes, higher concentrations of free carriers in both - and -type layers are required for a broader use of this material in electronic devices. While high electron densities are routinely achieved through silicon doping,Götz et al. (1999); Sheu and Chi (2002) the efficiency of -type doping still lags behind and currently constitutes the major obstacle for further progress.
Magnesium substitutional to gallium has been hitherto recognized as the only effective -type doping in GaN.Amano et al. (1989); Nakamura et al. (1992); Nakamura, Mukai, and Senoh (1994) However, the occurrence of self-compensation upon heavy Mg doping prevents one to reach the required levels of hole densities.Kaufmann et al. (2000); Brochen et al. (2013) The precise origin of the self-compensation is still debated, but is likely associated to point defects.Kaufmann et al. (1998); Kozodoy et al. (1998); Van de Walle, Stampfl, and Neugebauer (1998); Hautakangas et al. (2003); Latham et al. (2003); Miceli and Pasquarello (2015, 2016) A recent theoretical study has suggested the Mg interstitial (Mg) to play a key role in this process.Miceli and Pasquarello (2016, 2015) This proposal has subsequently received support from a emission channeling experiment, which provided a direct proof of the occurrence of Mg.Wahl et al. (2017) To complete this picture, it is important to understand the diffusion properties of the Mg interstitial, which determine the device processing procedures and the electrical properties of the grown samples.Fahey, Griffin, and Plummer (1989) The description of the Mg diffusion process in GaN achieved so far is highly inconsistent. Experimental investigations lead to a large spread of diffusion barriers ranging from 1.3 to 5 eV.Chang et al. (1999); Pan and Chi (1999); Benzarti et al. (2008); Köhler et al. (2013); Wahl et al. (2017) Recent experimental estimates situate the transition barrier in a fairly large interval ranging from 1.3 to 2.0 eV.Wahl et al. (2017) In addition, a theoretical study based on classical force fields yields activation barriers lower than 0.7 eV, and is thus not helpful in sorting out the experimental data.Harafuji, Tsuchiya, and Kawamura (2003)
In this Letter, we investigate the minimum energy paths and the transition barriers for the diffusion of the interstitial Mg impurity in wurtzite GaN using density-functional calculations. For comparison, we also include in our study the diffusion of Li, Na, and Be ions. Larger ionic radii or larger ionic charges generally lead to higher energy barriers. The diffusion is generally quite isotropic, except for Be2+, which diffuses with particularly low barriers in directions perpendicular to the -axis. The average energy barrier calculated for Mg2+ is 2.1 eV, in agreement with the range of values estimated in a recent experimental study.Wahl et al. (2017)
In this work, the atomic geometries and the energetics of the impurities in GaN are determined within the framework of density functional theory based on the generalized gradient approximation proposed by Perdew, Becke, and Ernzerhof (PBE).Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (1996) Our computational scheme relies on norm-conserving pseudopotentials and plane-wave basis sets as implemented in the quantum-espresso software package.Giannozzi et al. (2009) The kinetic energy cut-off for the plane-wave basis sets is set at 45 Ry. The cation interstitial impurities are modeled in 96-atom supercells of GaN. We use lattice parameters fixed at their experimental values ( Å and Å, Ref. Madelung, 2004), as they differ by less than 0.3% from the equilibrium PBE values. The Brillouin zone of the supercell is sampled with one special k-point lying off the point. The minimum energy paths of cation diffusion are identified through the nudged-elastic-band (NEB) scheme.Henkelman and Jónsson (2000) We adopted a climbing image to determine the geometries and the energy barriers at the transition states.Henkelman, Uberuga, and Jónsson (2000) A minimization algorithm is applied until the residual total forces acting on each image in the direction perpendicular to the path are smaller than 0.05 eV/Å. To test the convergence of our calculations, we also evaluate the activation energies for Be diffusion using a denser k-point grid. Similarly, we examined the effect of electrons included in the Ga valence shell. The activation energies are found to remain unchanged within 0.1 eV. To estimate the effect of using experimental rather than theoretical lattice parameters, we focus on the energy difference between the impurity in the octahedral and in the tetrahedral site, and find equivalent values within 0.05 eV. Furthermore, we use the same energy difference to examine the long-range relaxation effects resulting from the use of a finite supercell in the case of Mg. Using a larger supercell of 289 atoms, we find agreement within 0.03 eV.
The wurtzite structure achieves a tetrahedral-octahedral honeycomb space-filling with either Ga or N atoms at the vertices of the polyhedra. As a matter of convenience, we illustrate in Fig. 1 the Ga-based tessellation. To determine the ground-state for interstitial impurities, we place the cations at the centers of the interstitial polyhedra and allow for atomic relaxation until a locally stable structure is achieved. In all cases, the ground state is found for the cation in the position O′ within the octahedral volume. The energy of the metastable state lying within the tetrahedral volume lies higher in energy by 1.10, 2.86, 0.57, and 2.04 eV for Li+, Na+, Be2+, and Mg2+, respectively.
Within the octahedral volume, the ground-state site O′ lies on the axis of the hexagonal channel and thus preserves the axial symmetry of the wurtzite structure. For the investigated impurities, we give in Table 1 the distances between the O′ site and the nearest neighbor atoms of the GaN lattice, as well as its displacement OO′ with respect to the ideal O site. We observe that the Na+ ion, which features the largest ionic radius (cf. Table 1), lies closest to the ideal O site, whereas the Be2+ and Li+, which have smaller ionic radii lie closer to the plane of the N anions. A graphical view of the location of the O′ site with respect to the atomic planes is displayed in Fig. 2(b). In particular, we obtain for Mg2+ an OO′ displacement of 0.35 Å, to be compared with the shift of Å measured in Ref. Wahl et al., 2017.
In the metastable tetrahedral site, the Li+, Na+, and Mg2+ cations are fourfold coordinated by nearest-neighbor N atoms and are aligned with the Ga and N lattice atoms in a column parallel to the -axis. At variance, the Be2+ ion finds its metastable position at the centers of the tetrahedron faces, where it can optimize its interactions with three nearest neighbor N atoms due to its small size.
The diffusion in GaN can be described by determining the minimum energy paths between nearby octahedral sites. By comparing the formation energies of charged and neutral species, we verified that the ionic state is always preserved along all the considered diffusion paths. Hence, there is no tendency to generate localized electronic states during the diffusion of the interstitial impurities.
The interstitial ionic species can migrate through the open hexagonal channel parallel to the -axis, which we denote as path . As shown in Fig. 2(a), the ionic species directly hop between adjacent octahedral sites by crossing the double GaN-layer perpendicular to the [0001] direction. In the case of Mg2+, this diffusion path runs straight along the axis of the channel as shown in Fig. 2(b). The lack of centrosymmetry in the wurtzite structure yields a non-symmetric minimum-energy-path profile with an energy barrier of 2.01 eV. At the transition state, the coordinate of the Mg2+ ion along the -axis closely corresponds to plane of Ga atoms, with a Ga-Mg distance of 2.26 Å. The Li*+* and Na*+* ions diffusing along the -axis show the same behavior [Fig. 2(b)]. For these atomic species, we find energy barriers of 1.05 and 2.41 eV and distances to Ga atoms of 2.07 and 2.17 Å, respectively. The calculated diffusion barrier of Li*+* along the axis is lower by 0.5 eV than obtained in a previous study with the local density approximation and with a smaller unit cell.Bernardini and Fiorentini (2000) By comparing the Li*+* and Na*+* ions, which both carry the same charge, one remarks that the larger ionic radius of the latter causes a significant increase in the ionic barrier. To estimate the effect of the charge, one can compare the diffusion of Mg2+ and Li*+* ions, which feature similar ionic radii. It is seen that the larger ionic charge of the Mg2+ ion leads to a higher barrier. For the Be2+ ion, we observe that the lowest-energy path does not run along the axis of the hexagonal channel [see Fig. 2(b)]. At the transition state, the Be2+ ion shows two N atoms at a distance of 1.85 Å and a third one at 2.05 Å, leading to an energy barrier of 1.88 eV (cf. Fig. 3). This path is made possible because of the small ionic radius of the Be2+ ion. Our results for the diffusion path of Be2+ qualitatively agree with a previous study within the local density approximation,Van de Walle, Limpijumnong, and Neugebauer (2001) but the energy barrier calculated in this work is found to be lower by 0.89 eV. We carefully checked the convergence against all the computational parameters ensuring convergence of our result within 0.1 eV. The origin of the higher barrier in Ref. Van de Walle, Limpijumnong, and Neugebauer, 2001 should thus be ascribed to the use of a different energy functional.
The ionic impurities can also diffuse in directions orthogonal to the -axis. The impurity can diffuse between two nearby octahedral volumes O1 and O2 passing through the tetrahedral volume T that connects them. This diffusion channel is denoted as path and is schematically illustrated in Fig. 4(a). By symmetry, the paths O1-T and T-O2 are equivalent. For all diffusing species considered here, the minimum energy path passes through the metastable tetrahedral site. For Mg2+, Li+, and Na+, this leads to a single transition state. We find respective energy barriers of 2.20, 1.16, and 2.95 eV (Fig. 3 and Table 2). The trends with ionic size and charge are the same as for the diffusion along path . In the case of Be2+, the metastable position in the tetrahedral volume lies off the axis of the tetrahedron and three transition states occur upon the O1-T-O2 migration with very similar energy barriers of 0.72, 0.76, and 0.72 eV (Fig. 3). We assign this different behavior to the small size of Be2+, leading to distances of only 1.61 Å to the nearest N atoms at the transition states. In Ref. Van de Walle, Limpijumnong, and Neugebauer, 2001, the energy barrier for Be2+ along this path was found to be 1.18 eV, larger by 0.42 eV than the present finding, but not as different as found for path .
We also identified a second nonequivalent diffusion channel for migration perpendicular to the -axis, which we denote as path . Unlike paths and , this channel does not correspond to a sequence of jumps between interstitial volumes, but implies a concerted mechanism, which involves the breaking of a Ga–N bond of the lattice. As schematically illustrated in Fig. 4(b), the interstitial impurity in the octahedral site heads straight onto the center of a Ga–N bond, causing the Ga and N atoms to move apart along the direction. This movement is facilitated by the occurrence of the interstitial tetrahedral volumes T1 and T2, which can accommodate these atoms. At the transition state, the interstitial impurity, the Ga atom, and the N atom are vertically aligned along the direction [cf. Fig. 4(b)]. After the transition state, the Ga–N bond is formed back and the diffusing impurity moves to its ground state in the nearest octahedral volume. Path is found as a stable diffusion channel only for Mg2+ and Na*+. The respective calculated energy barriers are 2.19 and 2.01 eV (see Table 2). In the plane perpendicular to the -axis, the diffusion of Mg2+* along path shows approximately the same barrier as along path . However, in the case of Na*+, the energy barrier of path is lower than that of path by almost 1 eV. In the case of Be2+* and Li*+*, nudged-elastic-band calculations started from path revert spontaneously to path . These results indicate that path becomes viable only for impurities with either a large ionic radius or a large ionic charge.
All the calculated energy barriers are collected in Table 2. We remark that Li*+* and Mg2+ show almost the same energy barriers along paths parallel and perpendicular to the -axis, resulting in close to isotropic diffusion. This is true to a lesser extent for Na*+, for which the energy barriers differ up to 20% from their average. The anisotropy is more pronounced in the case of Be2+, for which the relative difference reaches 42% with respect to the average. For understanding the specific behavior of Be2+, we draw a comparison with Mg2+* along paths and . Along path , the impurity crosses sequentially a triangle of N atoms and one of Ga atoms, the latter being responsible for the energy barrier. Along path , the impurity also crosses triangles of N and Ga atoms, but simultaneously. This should lead to a lower energy barrier in the latter case, due to a more effective screening of the N atoms at the transition state. Indeed, this explains the anisotropy found for Be2+.Van de Walle, Limpijumnong, and Neugebauer (2001) However, we do not see a similar reduction of the energy barrier along path for Mg2+, despite this ion carries the same charge. Inspection of the transition state reveals that along path the transition of Mg2+ requires the outward displacement of the N atoms, unlike for the smaller Be2+. This effect entails an energy cost, which opposes the more effective Coulombic screening and leads to similar energy barriers for path and in the case of Mg2+. This comparison clearly emphasizes the intricate interplay between size and charge effects in determining the transition barriers of such ionic species in GaN.
In conclusion, we studied the diffusion of Mg2+ and other interstitial cations in GaN using density functional calculations. We identified three nonequivalent diffusion channels: one parallel and two perpendicular to the -axis of the wurtzite crystal structure. The energy barriers generally increase with ionic radius and ionic charge, but their interplay leads to nontrivial effects. The energy barriers of Mg2+ calculated in this work support experimental estimates of about 2 eV.Benzarti et al. (2008); Wahl et al. (2017)
Financial support is acknowledged from the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant No. 200020-152799). We used computational resources of CSCS and CSEA-EPFL.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Pearton et al. (1999) S. Pearton, J. Zolper, R. Shul, and F. Ren, J. Appl. Phys. 86 , 1 (1999).
- 2Götz et al. (1999) W. Götz, R. Kern, C. Chen, H. Liu, D. Steigerwald, and R. Fletcher, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 59 , 211 (1999).
- 3Sheu and Chi (2002) J.-K. Sheu and G. Chi, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 , R 657 (2002).
- 4Amano et al. (1989) H. Amano, M. Kito, K. Hiramatsu, and I. Akasaki, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 28 , L 2112 (1989).
- 5Nakamura et al. (1992) S. Nakamura, T. Mukai, M. Senoh, and N. Iwasa, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31 , L 139 (1992).
- 6Nakamura, Mukai, and Senoh (1994) S. Nakamura, T. Mukai, and M. Senoh, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64 , 1687 (1994).
- 7Kaufmann et al. (2000) U. Kaufmann, P. Schlotter, H. Obloh, K. Köhler, and M. Maier, Phys. Rev. B 62 , 10867 (2000).
- 8Brochen et al. (2013) S. Brochen, J. Brault, S. Chenot, A. Dussaigne, M. Leroux, and B. Damilano, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 , 032102 (2013).
