Laboratory analogues simulating Titan's atmospheric aerosols: Compared chemical compositions of grains and thin films
N. Carrasco, F. Jomard, J. Vigneron, A. Etcheberry, G. Cernogora

TL;DR
This study compares the chemical compositions of laboratory-produced Titan aerosol analogues, grains and thin films, revealing significant differences likely due to etching processes, which impact their suitability for radiative modeling.
Contribution
It demonstrates that grains and films produced under the same conditions are chemically different, highlighting the importance of selecting appropriate analogues for Titan atmospheric studies.
Findings
Films are less nitrogen- and hydrogen-rich than grains.
Etching likely causes compositional differences between grains and films.
Higher nitrogen in grains suggests greater optical absorption.
Abstract
Two sorts of solid organic samples can be produced in laboratory experiments simulating Titan atmospheric reactivity: grains in the volume and thin films on the reactor walls. We expect that grains are more representative of Titan atmospheric aerosols, but films are used to provide optical indices for radiative models of Titan atmosphere. The aim of the present study is to address if these two sorts of analogues are chemically equivalent or not, when produced in the same N2-CH4 plasma discharge. The chemical compositions of both these materials are measured by using elemental analysis, XPS analysis and Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry. The main parameter probed is the CH4 N2 ratio to explore various possible chemical regimes. We find that films are homogeneous but significantly less rich in nitrogen and hydrogen than grains produced in the same experimental conditions. This surprising…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
