# Laboratory analogues simulating Titan's atmospheric aerosols: Compared chemical compositions of grains and thin films

## TL;DR

This study compares the chemical compositions of laboratory-produced Titan aerosol analogues, grains and thin films, revealing significant differences likely due to etching processes, which impact their suitability for radiative modeling.

## Contribution

It demonstrates that grains and films produced under the same conditions are chemically different, highlighting the importance of selecting appropriate analogues for Titan atmospheric studies.

## Key findings

- Films are less nitrogen- and hydrogen-rich than grains.
- Etching likely causes compositional differences between grains and films.
- Higher nitrogen in grains suggests greater optical absorption.

## Abstract

Two sorts of solid organic samples can be produced in laboratory experiments simulating Titan atmospheric reactivity: grains in the volume and thin films on the reactor walls. We expect that grains are more representative of Titan atmospheric aerosols, but films are used to provide optical indices for radiative models of Titan atmosphere. The aim of the present study is to address if these two sorts of analogues are chemically equivalent or not, when produced in the same N2-CH4 plasma discharge. The chemical compositions of both these materials are measured by using elemental analysis, XPS analysis and Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry. The main parameter probed is the CH4 N2 ratio to explore various possible chemical regimes. We find that films are homogeneous but significantly less rich in nitrogen and hydrogen than grains produced in the same experimental conditions. This surprising difference in their chemical compositions could be explained by the efficient etching occurring on the films, which stay in the discharge during the whole plasma duration, whereas the grains are ejected after a few minutes. The higher nitrogen content in the grains possibly involves a higher optical absorption than the one measured on the films, with a possible impact on Titan radiative models.

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1705.01905