TL;DR
This paper analyzes various crowd-engagement information systems using Crowd Capital theory, providing a comparative framework for practitioners and insights into the properties of engaged crowds for researchers.
Contribution
It offers a detailed comparison of crowd-engagement IS tools and explores key properties of crowds, bridging practical decision-making and theoretical understanding.
Findings
Provides a decision-making resource for practitioners
Unpacks properties of crowds engaged by IS tools
Highlights differences in crowd capabilities
Abstract
In this work we use the theory of Crowd Capital as a lens to compare and contrast a number of IS tools currently in use by organizations for crowd-engagement purposes. In doing so, we contribute to both the practitioner and research domains. For the practitioner community we provide decision-makers with a convenient and useful resource, in table-form, outlining in detail some of the differing potentialities of crowd-engaging IS. For the research community we begin to unpack some of the key properties of crowd-engaging IS, including some of the differing qualities of the crowds that these IS application engage.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.