PUSHing Core-Collapse Supernovae to Explosions in Spherical Symmetry: Nucleosynthesis Yields
Sanjana Sinha, Carla Fr\"ohlich, Kevin Ebinger, Albino Perego,, Matthias Hempel, Marius Eichler, Matthias Liebend\"orfer, Friedrich-Karl, Thielemann

TL;DR
This paper introduces the PUSH method for simulating core-collapse supernovae in spherical symmetry, enabling more accurate nucleosynthesis yield predictions by leveraging neutrino-driven explosions calibrated against SN1987A.
Contribution
The paper presents the PUSH method, a new neutrino-based explosion mechanism that improves the realism of supernova simulations and nucleosynthesis yield calculations.
Findings
Successful reproduction of supernova explosions using PUSH.
Comparison of nucleosynthesis yields with observational data.
Potential for comprehensive element yield predictions across progenitors.
Abstract
Core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) are the extremely energetic deaths of massive stars. They play a vital role in the synthesis and dissemination of many heavy elements in the universe. In the past, CCSN nucleosynthesis calculations have relied on artificial explosion methods that do not adequately capture the physics of the innermost layers of the star. The PUSH method, calibrated against SN1987A, utilizes the energy of heavy-flavor neutrinos emitted by the proto-neutron star (PNS) to trigger parametrized explosions. This makes it possible to follow the consistent evolution of the PNS and to ensure a more accurate treatment of the electron fraction of the ejecta. Here, we present the Iron group nucleosynthesis results for core-collapse supernovae, exploded with PUSH, for two different progenitor series. Comparisons of the calculated yields to observational metal-poor star data are also…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
\recdate
Aug 20, 2016
PUSHing Core-Collapse Supernovae to Explosions in Spherical Symmetry: Nucleosynthesis Yields
Sanjana Sinha1
Carla Fröhlich1
Kevin Ebinger2
Albino Perego3
Matthias Hempel2
Marius Eichler2,3
Matthias Liebendörfer2
and Friedrich-Karl Thielemann2 1Department of Physics1Department of Physics North Carolina State University North Carolina State University Raleigh Raleigh NC NC 29695-8202 29695-8202 USA
2Department für Physik USA
2Department für Physik Universität Basel Universität Basel CH-4056 Basel CH-4056 Basel Switzerland
3Institut für Kernphysik Switzerland
3Institut für Kernphysik Technische Universität Darmstadt Technische Universität Darmstadt D-64289 Darmstadt D-64289 Darmstadt Germany Germany [email protected]
Abstract
Core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) are the extremely energetic deaths of massive stars. They play a vital role in the synthesis and dissemination of many heavy elements in the universe. In the past, CCSN nucleosynthesis calculations have relied on artificial explosion methods that do not adequately capture the physics of the innermost layers of the star. The PUSH method, calibrated against SN1987A, utilizes the energy of heavy-flavor neutrinos emitted by the proto-neutron star (PNS) to trigger parametrized explosions. This makes it possible to follow the consistent evolution of the PNS and to ensure a more accurate treatment of the electron fraction of the ejecta. Here, we present the Iron group nucleosynthesis results for core-collapse supernovae, exploded with PUSH, for two different progenitor series. Comparisons of the calculated yields to observational metal-poor star data are also presented. Nucleosynthesis yields will be calculated for all elements and over a wide range of progenitor masses. These yields can be immensely useful for models of galactic chemical evolution.
stars: supernovae: general, nucleosynthesis
1 Introduction
The detailed mechanism of core-collapse supernovae is still an open question which is being investigated using sophisticated multi-dimensional models. However, at the present time, these models are too computationally expensive for systematic nucleosynthesis studies of multiple progenitors. For a recent review of multi-dimensional core-collapse simulations, see Janka et al. (2016)[1] and references therein. In order to make nucleosynthesis predictions and discover general trends, we still require robust and readily calculable models which capture the relevant physics of the explosion.
The PUSH method [2] triggers explosions in otherwise non-exploding simulations by parametrically increasing the efficiency of neutrino energy deposition inside the gain region. This is done by depositing a fraction of the luminosity of heavy-flavor neutrinos (emitted by the PNS) behind the shock. The mass cut emerges naturally in the simulation and the electron fraction is followed consistently. Despite their effective character, PUSH models are robust, computationally affordable and self-consistent. We present the Iron group nucleosynthesis yields for CCSNe, calculated for models from two progenitor series, exploded using PUSH.
2 Methods
The evolution of the electron fraction () strongly affects nucleosynthesis in the innermost ejected stellar layers, where the predominant production of Iron group elements occurs. The can change due to electron neutrino and anti-neutrino interactions.
PUSH simulations follow the evolution consistently and provide input trajectories for post-processing, as outlined in [2]. The isotropic diffusion source approximation (IDSA)[3] is employed for electron neutrino and anti-neutrino transport while an advanced spectral leakage (ASL)[4] scheme is used for transport of heavy-lepton flavor neutrinos. The nuclear reaction network, CFNET, follows the abundances of 2000 isotopes to compute the composition of the supernova ejecta. The isotopes included cover the neutron-deficient as well as the neutron-rich side of the valley of -stability.
3 Results
Sneden et al. (2016) [5] used the most recent and improved laboratory data for Fe-group neutral and singly-ionized transitions to derive robust abundances in the very metal-poor main sequence turnoff star HD 84937. Figure 1 shows the reported abundance ratios of Fe-group elements along with the PUSH nucleosynthesis yields for the Fe-group. The yields depicted are for solar and sub-solar metallicity progenitors from Woosley et al. (2002)[6](WHW02). Different combinations of parameters and correspond to variations in the artificial heating provided by PUSH, selected to satisfy observational constraints from SN1987A. There are no significant variations seen in the [X/Fe] values obtained for the different parameter settings.
PUSH yields are shown in Figure 2 along with piston yields from Woosley et al. (1995) [7] and thermal bomb yields from Thielemann et al. (1996) [8] for a 25M⊙ model from the WHW02 progenitor set. For most members of this progenitor set, Manganese ratios are found to be very low compared to those seen in HD 84937.
PUSH yields were calculated for the Woosley et al. (2007) [9] (WH07) progenitor series in addition to WHW02 progenitors. Most of the Fe-group yields for WH07 progenitors are similar to those for WHW02 progenitors but Manganese ratios show a marked improvement. Figure 3 shows the calculated yields for a 25M⊙ WH07 progenitor.
4 Conclusions and Outlook
We find that explosions with detailed evolution give a much better match with observational abundances in HD 84937. Additionally, the Fe-group nucleosynthesis yields appear to depend significantly on the choice of progenitor series.
Nucleosynthesis yields will be calculated for all elements and over a wide range of progenitor masses in a future work [10], available as input for models of galactic chemical evolution.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported through an Early Career Award by the United States Department of Energy (DOE grant no. SC0010263).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] H.-T. Janka, T. Melson and A. Summa: Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 66 (2016) 341
- 2[2] A. Perego, M. Hempel, C. Fröhlich et al.: Ap J, 806 (2015) 275
- 3[3] M. Liebendörfer, S. C. Whitehouse and T. Fischer: Ap J, 698 (2009) 1174
- 4[4] A. Perego, R. M. Cabezón and R. Käppeli: Ap J Suppl., 223 (2016) 22
- 5[5] C. Sneden, J. J. Cowan and C. Kobayashi: Ap J, 817 (2016) 53
- 6[6] S. E. Woosley, A. Heger and T. A. Weaver: Rev. Mod. Phys., 74 (2002) 1015
- 7[7] S. E. Woosley and T.A. Weaver: Ap JS, 101 (1995) 181
- 8[8] F.-K. Thielemann, K. Nomoto and M.-A. Hashimoto: Ap J, 460 (1996) 408
