A Kochen-Specker Theorem for Imprecisely Specified Measurement
N. David Mermin

TL;DR
This paper refutes the claim that finite measurement precision nullifies the Kochen-Specker theorem, demonstrating that small experimental variations do not eliminate the theorem's implications due to the continuity of measurement outcome probabilities.
Contribution
It provides a rigorous argument showing that finite precision does not invalidate the Kochen-Specker theorem, countering recent claims to the contrary.
Findings
Finite precision does not nullify the Kochen-Specker theorem.
Measurement outcome probabilities are continuous under small experimental changes.
The theorem's implications remain robust despite experimental imprecision.
Abstract
A recent claim that finite precision in the design of real experiments ``nullifies'' the impact of the Kochen-Specker theorem, is shown to be unsupportable, because of the continuity of probabilities of measurement outcomes under slight changes in the experimental configuration.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation · Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference · Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
