What is paradoxical about the "Three-box paradox"?
J. Finkelstein (LBNL, SJSU)
TL;DR
This paper discusses the nature of the 'Three-box paradox' and critiques the claim that it is inherently paradoxical, providing a detailed analysis of its conceptual foundations.
Contribution
It offers a critical examination of the arguments defending the paradoxical nature of the Three-box paradox, clarifying misconceptions and proposing alternative interpretations.
Findings
The paradoxical nature of the Three-box paradox is not definitive.
Clarification of the conceptual issues surrounding the paradox.
Potential resolution pathways for the paradox are discussed.
Abstract
This paper is a comment on quant-ph/0606067 by Ravon and Vaidman, in which they defend the position that the ``three-box paradox'' is indeed paradoxical.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Philosophy and History of Science