Semiclassical interpretation of microscopic processes
Milos V. Lokajicek

TL;DR
This paper discusses the upper limits of the Bell operator in different physical interpretations, proposing a semiclassical model that aligns with experimental data and offers an alternative view on microscopic processes.
Contribution
It introduces a semiclassical hidden-variable model based on extended Hilbert space that interprets Bell inequalities within quantum and hidden-variable frameworks.
Findings
Classical limit of Bell operator excluded by experiments
Quantum and hidden-variable limits are consistent with observed data
Proposes a semiclassical model aligning with microscopic process interpretations
Abstract
There are three upper limits (2, 2.sqrt{2}, 2.sqrt{3}) of the Bell operator corresponding to different physical concepts: classical, hidden-variable and quantum-mechanical. Only the classical concept corresponding to the lowest limit has been excluded by experimental data, while the other two should be regarded as acceptable for the interpretation of EPR experiments and all microscopic processes. A corresponding hidden-variable or semiclassical model (based on the extended Hilbert space) will be proposed and shortly described.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Biofield Effects and Biophysics · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
