A geometric approach to quantum circuit lower bounds

TL;DR

This paper introduces a geometric method using Finsler metrics to establish lower bounds on quantum circuit size, linking geodesic lengths to circuit complexity and providing new tools for quantum computational complexity analysis.

Contribution

It develops a geometric framework with Finsler metrics to analyze quantum circuit lower bounds, including the construction of geodesic equations and solutions called Pauli geodesics.

Findings

Minimal geodesic length bounds quantum circuit size.

Pauli geodesics are solutions for certain unitaries.

Most unitaries have exponential-length minimal Pauli geodesics.

Abstract

What is the minimal size quantum circuit required to exactly implement a specified n-qubit unitary operation, U, without the use of ancilla qubits? We show that a lower bound on the minimal size is provided by the length of the minimal geodesic between U and the identity, I, where length is defined by a suitable Finsler metric on SU(2^n). The geodesic curves of such a metric have the striking property that once an initial position and velocity are set, the remainder of the geodesic is completely determined by a second order differential equation known as the geodesic equation. This is in contrast with the usual case in circuit design, either classical or quantum, where being given part of an optimal circuit does not obviously assist in the design of the rest of the circuit. Geodesic analysis thus offers a potentially powerful approach to the problem of proving quantum circuit lower bounds. In this paper we construct several Finsler metrics whose minimal length geodesics provide lower bounds on quantum circuit size, and give a procedure to compute the corresponding geodesic equation. We also construct a large class of solutions to the geodesic equation, which we call Pauli geodesics, since they arise from isometries generated by the Pauli group. For any unitary U diagonal in the computational basis, we show that: (a) provided the minimal length geodesic is unique, it must be a Pauli geodesic; (b) finding the length of the minimal Pauli geodesic passing from I to U is equivalent to solving an exponential size instance of the closest vector in a lattice problem (CVP); and (c) all but a doubly exponentially small fraction of such unitaries have minimal Pauli geodesics of exponential length.