Bell's Theorem : The Naive View of an Experimentalist
Alain Aspect

TL;DR
This paper explains Bell's Inequalities as a test for local hidden variable theories versus quantum mechanics, showing that quantum predictions violate these inequalities, thus challenging local realism in quantum physics.
Contribution
It clarifies the derivation of Bell's theorem from reasonable assumptions and discusses the experimental tests in quantum optics that challenge local hidden variable theories.
Findings
Quantum mechanics violates Bell's Inequalities in experiments.
Locality assumption is crucial for Bell's theorem.
Quantum optics experiments support non-locality.
Abstract
In the first part of this presentation (sections 2 to 6), I show that Bell's Inequalities provide a quantitative criterion to test "reasonable" Supplementary Parameters Theories versus Quantum Mechanics. Following Bell, I first explain the motivations for considering supplementary parameters theories: the argument is based on an analysis of the famous Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) Gedankenexperiment . Introducing a reasonable Locality Condition, we will then derive Bell's theorem, which states: (i) that Local Supplementary Parameters Theories are constrained by Bell's Inequalities; (ii) that certain predictions of Quantum Mechanics violate Bell's Inequalities, and therefore that Quantum Mechanics is incompatible with Local Supplementary Parameters Theories. I then point out that a fundamental assumption for this conflict is the Locality assumption, and I show that in a more…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhilosophy and History of Science
