Why can states and measurement outcomes be represented as vectors?
Piero G. L. Mana

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates how states and measurement outcomes in quantum and classical systems can be naturally represented as vectors in a real vector space, linking probability data to geometric representations.
Contribution
It introduces a natural vector space representation for states and measurement outcomes from probability data tables, connecting classical and quantum formalisms.
Findings
Vector representations follow naturally from probability data tables.
Properties of the resulting vector sets are analyzed.
Connections with quantum-mechanical formalism are discussed.
Abstract
It is shown how, given a "probability data table" for a quantum or classical system, the representation of states and measurement outcomes as vectors in a real vector space follows in a natural way. Some properties of the resulting sets of these vectors are discussed, as well as some connexions with the quantum-mechanical formalism.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
