Large N Quantum Cryptography
Adrian Kent (Centre for Quantum Computation, University of Cambridge)

TL;DR
This paper explores how repeating quantum cryptographic tasks multiple times can enhance security, enabling partial or near-perfect security even when single implementations are insecure, demonstrated through protocols for bit commitment and random number generation.
Contribution
It introduces the concept that multiple executions of quantum cryptographic tasks can achieve security levels unattainable by single executions, with practical protocols for bit commitment and randomness.
Findings
Multiple copies can provide useful partial security.
Protocols for quantum bit string commitment.
Protocols for quantum random number generation.
Abstract
In quantum cryptography, the level of security attainable by a protocol which implements a particular task times bears no simple relation to the level of security attainable by a protocol implementing the task once. Useful partial security, and even near-perfect security in an appropriate sense, can be obtained for copies of a task which itself cannot be securely implemented. We illustrate this with protocols for quantum bit string commitment and quantum random number generation between mistrustful parties.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
