Comments on some recently proposed experiments that should distinguish Bohmian mechanics from quantum mechanics
W. Struyve, W. De Baere

TL;DR
This paper critically examines recent experimental proposals claiming to differentiate Bohmian mechanics from standard quantum mechanics, and argues that these claims are unfounded, challenging their validity.
Contribution
The paper refutes recent claims of experiments that purportedly distinguish Bohmian mechanics from quantum mechanics, clarifying misconceptions and demonstrating their unfounded nature.
Findings
Recent experimental proposals are invalid for distinguishing the theories
Claims of differentiating experiments are unfounded
Theoretical analysis refutes previous claims
Abstract
Recently Ghose (quant-ph/0001024,quant-ph/0003037,quant-ph/0103126) and Golshani and Akhavan (quant-ph/0009040,quant-ph/0103100,quant-ph/0103101) claimed to have found experiments that should be able to distinguish between Standard Quantum Mechanics and Bohmian Mechanics. It is our aim to show that the claims made by Ghose, Golshani and Akhavan are unfounded.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science
