Comments on "On Bohm trajectories in two-particle interference devices" by L. Marchildon
Partha Ghose
TL;DR
This paper refutes Marchildon's criticisms of previous work on Bohm trajectories in two-particle interference, clarifying misunderstandings and defending the original conclusions.
Contribution
It provides a counter-argument to Marchildon's critique, reaffirming the validity of the original analysis of Bohm trajectories.
Findings
Marchildon's criticisms are refuted
Original work on Bohm trajectories remains valid
Clarification of misunderstandings in the debate
Abstract
Marchildon's arguments against my earlier work are refuted.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum-Dot Cellular Automata