A classification of classical representations for quantum-like systems
Bob Coecke

TL;DR
This paper classifies classical representations of quantum-like systems, revealing their structural properties and providing explicit examples, thereby deepening understanding of the classical-quantum interface.
Contribution
It introduces a poset structure for non-equivalent classical representations and constructs explicit finite-dimensional quantum mechanics representations.
Findings
The collection of non-equivalent representations forms a poset.
No smallest representation exists due to the poset not being a semi-lattice.
An explicit finite-dimensional classical representation of quantum mechanics is constructed.
Abstract
For general non-classical systems, we study the different classical representations that fulfill the specific context dependence imposed by the hidden measurement system formalism introduced in quant-ph/0008061. We show that the collection of non-equivalent representations has a poset structure. We also show that in general, there exists no 'smallest' representation, since this poset is not a semi-lattice. Then we study the possible representations of quantum-like measurement systems. For example, we show that there exists a classical representation of finite dimensional quantum mechanics with as a set of states for the measurement context, and we build an explicit example of such a representation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
