Incompatibility between the principle of the constancy of the speed of light and the Lorentz contraction in the GPS Experiment

TL;DR

This paper discusses the apparent contradiction between the constancy of light speed and Lorentz contraction in GPS, questioning the compatibility of special relativity with observed GPS accuracy.

Contribution

It highlights the inconsistency between Lorentz contraction predictions and GPS precision, suggesting a need to re-examine relativistic assumptions in gravitational fields.

Findings

GPS accuracy contradicts expected Lorentz contraction effects at high velocities

Lorentz contraction is not observed in Earth's gravitational field

The paper questions the compatibility of special relativity with GPS operation

Abstract

Incompatibility between the principle of the constancy of the speed of light and the Lorentz contraction in the global positioning system (GPS) is discussed. The GPS works precisely in the earth-centered locally inertial (ECI) coordinate system on the condition that the speed of light c is assumed to be constant regardless of the inertial motion of the GPS satellites and the earth. The inertial system of the earth travels not only in the solar system at the velocity 30 km/s but also in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) at the velocity 700 km/s. The deviation on the car navigation system by the Lorentz contraction of 700 km/s is maximally estimated as 54 m. However, such a large deviation is not observed: that is, the Lorentz contraction is not observed in the gravitational field of the earth. If there is a Lorentz contraction, the GPS cannot work so precisely. The GPS satellites are in the gravitational field of the earth, therefore the system should be interpreted by the theory of general relativity as well as special relativity.