On the Nature of Science
B.K. Jennings

TL;DR
This paper presents a 21st-century perspective on science, emphasizing model-based progress, instrumentalism, and the evolving philosophical implications, while distinguishing science from religion.
Contribution
It offers a coherent description of scientific progress through models with increasing predictive power and discusses philosophical implications using instrumentalism and Occam's razor.
Findings
Science advances via models with greater predictive power
Philosophical implications evolve unpredictably with models
Error control is crucial for scientific progress
Abstract
A 21st century view of the nature of science is presented. It attempts to show how a consistent description of science and scientific progress can be given. Science advances through a sequence of models with progressively greater predictive power. The philosophical and metaphysical implications of the models change in unpredictable ways as the predictive power increases. The view of science arrived at is one based on instrumentalism. Philosophical realism can only be recovered by a subtle use of Occam's razor. Error control is seen to be essential to scientific progress. The nature of the difference between science and religion is explored.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhilosophy and History of Science · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Science and Climate Studies
