Quantitative and Qualitative Study of Gaussian Beam Visualization Techniques
J. Magnes, D. Odera, J. Hartke, M. Fountain, L. Florence, and V. Davis

TL;DR
This paper compares various laser beam profiling techniques, including knife-edge, scanning slit, pin-hole, and CCD methods, highlighting their accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and applicability for quantitative beam analysis.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison and visualization of existing laser beam profiling methods, emphasizing their practicality and ease of use.
Findings
CCD profiling methods offer accurate quantitative measurements.
Profiling techniques are inexpensive and easy to implement.
The paper presents visual comparisons of different methods.
Abstract
We present a comparative overview of existing laser beam profiling methods. We compare the the knife-edge, scanning slit, and pin-hole methods. Data is presented in a comparative fashion. We also elaborate on the use of CCD profiling methods and present appropriate imagery. These methods allow for a quantitative determination of transverse laser beam-profiles using inexpensive and accessible methods. The profiling techniques presented are inexpensive and easily applicable to a variety of experiments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
