The importance of the observer in science
Russell K. Standish

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the crucial role of the observer in understanding complexity, emergence, and quantum mechanics, proposing that acknowledging observation can resolve longstanding conceptual confusions in science.
Contribution
It introduces the idea that explicitly recognizing the observer's role can unify various complexity measures and clarify concepts like emergence and quantum mechanics.
Findings
Observer-based complexity measures can resolve contradictions.
Acknowledging the observer clarifies emergence as irreducibility.
Quantum mechanics can be viewed as a theory of observation.
Abstract
The concept of {\em complexity} (as a quantity) has been plagued by numerous contradictory and confusing definitions. By explicitly recognising a role for the observer of a system, an observer that attaches meaning to data about the system, these contradictions can be resolved, and the numerous complexity measures that have been proposed can be seen as cases where different observers are relevant, and/or being proxy measures that loosely scale with complexity, but are easy to compute from the available data. Much of the epistemic confusion in the subject can be squarely placed at science's tradition of removing the observer from the description in order to guarantee {\em objectivity}. Explicitly acknowledging the role of the observer helps untangle other confused subject areas. {\em Emergence} is a topic about which much ink has been spilt, but it can be understand easily as an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Philosophy and History of Science
