Comparisons of hadronic shower packages
G. Mavromanolakis, D. Ward
TL;DR
This paper compares different hadronic shower simulation packages, highlighting significant discrepancies among models and emphasizing the need for testbeam data to improve accuracy.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of hadronic shower simulation packages, revealing their differences and the importance of experimental data for validation.
Findings
Predictions from different models vary significantly.
Testbeam data is essential for resolving discrepancies.
Highlights the need for improved simulation accuracy.
Abstract
We report on simulation studies comparing various hadronic shower packages. Results show that predictions from different models vary significantly, illustrating the necessity of testbeam data to resolve the situation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · High-Energy Particle Collisions Research · Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena