Citation Statistics From More Than a Century of Physical Review
S. Redner

TL;DR
This study analyzes over a century of citation data from Physical Review journals, revealing patterns in citation distribution, impact, and evolution over time, including decay and burst phenomena.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive statistical analysis of citation dynamics over 110 years, highlighting temporal patterns and impact measures in physics literature.
Findings
Citations decay exponentially with age, especially for older papers.
Citations to a publication follow a power-law age distribution with an exponent near -1.
Identification of citation bursts and dramatic temporal features in citation histories.
Abstract
We study the statistics of citations from all Physical Review journals for the 110-year period 1893 until 2003. In addition to characterizing the citation distribution and identifying publications with the highest citation impact, we investigate how citations evolve with time. There is a positive correlation between the number of citations to a paper and the average age of citations. Citations from a publication have an exponentially decaying age distribution; that is, old papers tend to not get cited. In contrast, the citations to a publication are consistent with a power-law age distribution, with an exponent close to -1 over a time range of 2 -- 20 years. We also identify a number of strongly-correlated citation bursts and other dramatic features in the time history of citations to individual publications.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsscientometrics and bibliometrics research
