The Thermal Radiation Formula of Planck (1900)
Luis J. Boya (Zaragoza University)

TL;DR
This paper reviews the historical derivation of Planck's Radiation Formula, analyzing its development, the role of discreteness, and contrasting interpretations by key physicists and historians.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive historical and critical analysis of the derivation and interpretation of Planck's Radiation Formula, clarifying misconceptions and the evolution of its understanding.
Findings
Discreteness was central to Planck's original derivation.
Historical interpretations of Planck's work vary among physicists and historians.
The paper clarifies the debate on whether discontinuity was evident in Planck's initial work.
Abstract
We review the derivation of Planck's Radiation Formula on the light of recent studies in its centenary. We discuss specially the issue of discreteness, Planck's opinion on his discovery, and the critical analysis on the contributions by Ehrenfest, Einstein, Lorentz, etc. We also address the views of T.S. Kuhn, which conflict with the conventional interpretation that discontinuty was already found by Planck.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Biofield Effects and Biophysics
