Reply to "Comment on 'Comparison of potential models with the pp-scattering data below 350 MeV.' "
V.Stoks, J.J. de Swart
TL;DR
This paper defends a previous study comparing NN potential models with pp-scattering data, clarifying that identified flaws are not actual errors, and emphasizes the validity of their original analysis.
Contribution
It provides a rebuttal to criticisms of their earlier comparison study, reaffirming the accuracy of their potential model evaluations.
Findings
The supposed flaws are not genuine errors.
The original comparison remains valid.
The critique does not undermine the original results.
Abstract
Replying to the above Comment by G.Q.Li and R.Machleidt, we point out that the supposed "flaws" in our Comparison of NN potential models with the pp- scattering data [ Phys.Rev.C47,761(1993) ] are in reality not flaws at all.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies