A "No-Go" Theorem for the Existence of an Action Principle for Discrete Invertible Dynamical Systems
Gianluca Caterina, Bruce Boghosian

TL;DR
This paper proves that a least-action principle cannot exist for finite configuration space invertible discrete dynamical systems, but can be constructed for some infinite configuration space systems through phase space restriction.
Contribution
It establishes a no-go theorem for finite systems and identifies conditions under which an action principle can be recovered in infinite systems.
Findings
No least-action principle exists for finite configuration space systems.
Some infinite systems admit a constructed least-action principle.
Examples illustrate the applicability and limitations of the theorem.
Abstract
In this paper we study the problem of the existence of a least-action principle for invertible, second-order dynamical systems, discrete in time and space. We show that, when the configuration space is finite, a least-action principle does not exist for such systems. We dichotomize discrete dynamical systems with infinite configuration spaces into those of finite type for which this theorem continues to hold, and those not of finite type for which it is possible to construct a least-action principle. We also show how to recover an action by restriction of the phase space of certain second-order discrete dynamical systems. We provide numerous examples to illustrate each of these results.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Cellular Automata and Applications · Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
