When Can we Call a System Self-organizing?
Carlos Gershenson, Francis Heylighen

TL;DR
This paper explores the conditions and observer-dependent factors that determine when a system can be considered self-organizing, emphasizing the role of description level and entropy dynamics.
Contribution
It clarifies that self-organization is an observer-dependent concept influenced by description granularity and discusses ontological and practical implications.
Findings
Self-organization depends on the observer’s chosen description level.
Changing the granularity can make the same system appear self-organizing or disorganizing.
Self-organization is a perspective, not an intrinsic property of systems.
Abstract
We do not attempt to provide yet another definition of selforganization, but explore the conditions under which we can model a system as self-organizing. These involve the dynamics of entropy, and the purpose, aspects, and description level chosen by an observer. We show how, changing the level or "graining" of description, the same system can appear selforganizing or self-disorganizing. We discuss ontological issues we face when studying self-organizing systems, and analyse when designing and controlling artificial self-organizing systems is useful. We conclude that self-organization is a way of observing systems, not an absolute class of systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications · Cellular Automata and Applications · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
