Axioms for Weak Bialgebras
Florian Nill

TL;DR
This paper introduces new axioms for weak bialgebras that ensure their representation categories are monoidal and rigid, providing a clearer framework for understanding weak Hopf algebras and their duals.
Contribution
It proposes a novel set of axioms for weak bialgebras and antipodes, establishing conditions for monoidality and rigidity of their representation categories.
Findings
A new set of counit axioms guarantees monoidality of Rep A.
Conditions for the antipode S to make Rep A rigid are established.
Dual weak bialgebras are monoidal iff S is a bialgebra anti-homomorphism.
Abstract
Let A be a finite dimensional unital associative algebra over a field K, which is also equipped with a coassociative counital coalgebra structure (\Delta,\eps). A is called a Weak Bialgebra if the coproduct \Delta is multiplicative. We do not require \Delta(1) = 1 \otimes 1 nor multiplicativity of the counit \eps. Instead, we propose a new set of counit axioms, which are modelled so as to guarantee that \Rep\A becomes a monoidal category with unit object given by the cyclic A-submodule \E := (A --> \eps) \subset \hat A (\hat A denoting the dual weak bialgebra). Under these monoidality axioms \E and \bar\E := (\eps <-- A) become commuting unital subalgebras of \hat A which are trivial if and only if the counit \eps is multiplicative. We also propose axioms for an antipode S such that the category \Rep\A becomes rigid. S is uniquely determined, provided it exists. If a monoidal weak…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Operator Algebra Research · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
