Finite canonization
Saharon Shelah

TL;DR
This paper improves the bounds on the canonization theorem's parameters, showing the minimal number of exponentiations needed to compute ER(n,m) for fixed n is optimal, advancing understanding of finite canonization.
Contribution
It refines the bounds on ER(n,m), establishing the minimal exponentiation complexity for fixed n, thus optimizing the calculation process in finite canonization.
Findings
Improved the bound on ER(n,m) for fixed n.
Established the minimal number of exponentiations needed.
Optimized the calculation complexity for finite canonization.
Abstract
The canonization theorem says that for given m,n for some m^* (the first one is called ER(n;m)) we have: for every function f with domain [{1, ...,m^*}]^n, for some A in [{1, ...,m^*}]^m, the question of when the equality f({i_1, ...,i_n})=f({j_1, ...,j_n}) (where i_1< ... <i_n and j_1 < ... < j_n are from A) holds has the simplest answer: for some v subseteq {1, ...,n} the equality holds iff (for all l in v)(i_l = j_l). In this paper we improve the bound on ER(n,m) so that fixing n the number of exponentiation needed to calculate ER(n,m) is best possible.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLimits and Structures in Graph Theory · Advanced Graph Theory Research · graph theory and CDMA systems
