Defining an m-cluster category
Hugh Thomas

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that a specific orbit category captures the combinatorics of m-clusters, providing uniform proofs for key results in the simply laced cases, extending the understanding of cluster categories.
Contribution
It introduces a new orbit category that encodes m-cluster combinatorics, linking it to existing cluster categories and enabling uniform proofs.
Findings
Orbit category encodes m-cluster combinatorics
Provides type-uniform proofs for Fomin and Reading's results
Extends cluster category theory to m-clusters in simply laced cases
Abstract
We show that a certain orbit category considerd by Keller encodes the combinatorics of the -clusters of Fomin and Reading in a fashion similar to the way the cluster category of Buan, Marsh, Reineke, Reiten, and Todorov encodes the combinatorics of the clusters of Fomin and Zelevinsky. This allows us to give type-uniform proofs of certain results of Fomin and Reading in the simply laced cases.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
