On tunnel number one knots that are not (1,n)
Jesse Johnson, Abigail Thompson

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that for any natural number, there exist tunnel number one knots in the 3-sphere that cannot be represented as (1,n) knots, by establishing a lower bound on bridge number related to Heegaard splitting distance.
Contribution
It introduces a new lower bound on the bridge number of t-bridge knots based on Heegaard splitting distance, showing the existence of tunnel number one knots not equivalent to (1,n) knots.
Findings
Existence of tunnel number one knots not representable as (1,n)
Bridge number bounded below by a function of Heegaard splitting distance
For any natural number n, such knots exist
Abstract
We show that the bridge number of a bridge knot in with respect to an unknotted genus surface is bounded below by a function of the distance of the Heegaard splitting induced by the bridges. It follows that for any natural number , there is a tunnel number one knot in that is not .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · semigroups and automata theory
