G-automata, counter languages and the Chomsky hierarchy
Murray Elder

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between G-automata languages and formal language classes, showing that counter languages are context-sensitive and linking their complexity to the word problem of groups like a5^n.
Contribution
It establishes a connection between the word problem of groups and the classification of G-automata languages within the Chomsky hierarchy.
Findings
Counter languages are context-sensitive.
Counter languages are indexed iff the word problem for a5^n is indexed.
G-automata languages are contained within the class accepted by the group's word problem.
Abstract
We consider how the languages of -automata compare with other formal language classes. We prove that if the word problem of a group is accepted by a machine in the class then the language of any -automaton is in the class . It follows that the so called {\emph counter languages} (languages of -automata) are context-sensitive, and further that counter languages are indexed if and only if the word problem for is indexed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · DNA and Biological Computing · Geometric and Algebraic Topology
