A short proof of w_1^n(Hom(C_{2r+1}, K_{n+2}))=0 for all n and a graph colouring theorem by Babson and Kozlov
Carsten Schultz

TL;DR
This paper proves that the n-th power of the first Stiefel-Whitney class of a certain graph complex is zero, confirming a conjecture and strengthening a graph coloring theorem with a simpler proof.
Contribution
It provides a short, simplified proof of a conjecture by Babson and Kozlov, establishing the vanishing of a cohomology class for all n and strengthening their graph coloring theorem.
Findings
Confirmed the conjecture that the n-th power of the first Stiefel-Whitney class is zero for all n.
Proved the strong form of Babson and Kozlov's graph coloring theorem.
Simplified the proof of the weak form of the theorem, also known as the Lovász conjecture.
Abstract
We show that the n-th power of the first Stiefel-Whitney class of the Z_2-operation on the graph complex Hom(C_{2r+1},K_{n+2})$ is zero, confirming a conjecture by Babson and Kozlov. This proves the strong form of their graph colouring theorem, which they had only proven for odd n. Our proof is also considerably simpler than their proof of the weak form of the theorem, which is also known as the Lov\'asz conjecture.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopological and Geometric Data Analysis · Graph theory and applications · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
