On completeness in a non-Archimedean setting via firm reflections
D. Deses, E. Lowen-Colebunders

TL;DR
This paper develops a categorical completion theory for non-Archimedean spaces, establishing a unique and universal completion process that generalizes classical Hausdorff non-Archimedean uniform space completions.
Contribution
It introduces a new categorical framework for completing non-Archimedean spaces, characterizing complete objects and proving the existence and uniqueness of completions.
Findings
Complete objects form a firmly reflective subcategory.
Every non-Archimedean space has a unique completion.
The completion reduces to the classical case for Hausdorff non-Archimedean uniform spaces.
Abstract
We develop a completion theory for (general) non-Archimedean spaces based on the theory on "a categorical concept of completion of objects" as introduced by G.C.L. Br\"ummer and E. Giuli. Our context is the construct of all Hausdorff non-Archimedean spaces and uniformly continuous maps and is the class of all epimorphic embeddings in . We determine the class of all -injective objects and we present an internal characterization as "complete objects". The basic tool for this characterization is a notion of small collections that in some sense preserve the inclusion order on the non-Archimedean structure. We prove that the full subconstruct consisting of all complete objects forms a firmly -reflective subcategory. This means that every object in has a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical and Theoretical Analysis · Advanced Topology and Set Theory · advanced mathematical theories
