Seesaw words in Thompson's group F
Sean Cleary, Jennifer Taback

TL;DR
This paper introduces a family of words in Thompson's group F that challenge the search for minimal length representatives and demonstrate that F cannot be combed by geodesics, revealing new structural complexities.
Contribution
It identifies specific 'seesaw' words in Thompson's group F that illustrate limitations in existing methods for finding geodesic representatives and show non-combability by geodesics.
Findings
Existence of 'seesaw' words with limited suffix options
Demonstration that F is not geodesically combable
Insights into the structure of geodesics in F
Abstract
We describe a family of words in Thompson's group F which present a challenge to the question of finding canonical minimal length representatives, and which show that F is not combable by geodesics. These words have the property that there are only two possible suffixes of long lengths for geodesic paths to the word from the identity; one is of the form and the other of the form where g is a generator of the group.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
