A geometric Littlewood-Richardson rule
Ravi Vakil

TL;DR
This paper introduces a geometric Littlewood-Richardson rule that generalizes Pieri's rule, providing a new geometric proof and interpretation for the combinatorial Littlewood-Richardson rule, with broad implications in algebraic geometry and representation theory.
Contribution
It presents the first explicit geometric Littlewood-Richardson rule applicable over any field, linking geometric deformations with combinatorial models and extending to K-theory.
Findings
Provides a geometric proof of the Littlewood-Richardson rule.
Establishes a bijection with tableaux and puzzles.
Suggests approaches for open problems in Schubert calculus.
Abstract
We describe an explicit geometric Littlewood-Richardson rule, interpreted as deforming the intersection of two Schubert varieties so that they break into Schubert varieties. There are no restrictions on the base field, and all multiplicities arising are 1; this is important for applications. This rule should be seen as a generalization of Pieri's rule to arbitrary Schubert classes, by way of explicit homotopies. It has a straightforward bijection to other Littlewood-Richardson rules, such as tableaux, and Knutson and Tao's puzzles. This gives the first geometric proof and interpretation of the Littlewood-Richardson rule. It has a host of geometric consequences, described in the companion paper "Schubert induction". The rule also has an interpretation in K-theory, suggested by Buch, which gives an extension of puzzles to K-theory. The rule suggests a natural approach to the open…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Advanced Algebra and Geometry · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
