Local cohomology and D-affinity in positive characteristic
Masaki Kashiwara, Niels Lauritzen

TL;DR
This paper provides a counterexample showing that D-affinity and Beilinson-Bernstein equivalence do not hold in positive characteristic for certain flag varieties, contrasting with the zero characteristic case.
Contribution
It constructs a specific D-module on a Grassmannian in positive characteristic with non-vanishing cohomology, challenging existing assumptions.
Findings
Counterexample to D-affinity in positive characteristic
Non-vanishing first cohomology group for a D-module
Failure of Beilinson-Bernstein equivalence in this setting
Abstract
Comparing vanishing of local cohomology in zero and positive characteristic, we give an example of a D-module on a Grassmann variety in positive characteristic with non-vanishing first cohomology group. This is a counterexample to D-affinity and the Beilinson-Bernstein equivalence for flag manifolds in positive characteristic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Commutative Algebra and Its Applications · Advanced Topics in Algebra
